The Montevideo Convention and Taiwanese Identity .

                             At  present  ,   the   title  of   Taiwan   is   the   Republic  of   China  .  But  Taiwan  is  neither  a  state  nor  a   nation  .  The   R.O.C   is   the  government  of   the   Chinese   Nation  or   the  State   of  Chinese  .  So   we   would   say   that  ,  Taiwan  is   a  part  of    China  . ( the   R.O.C )  .  The   Taiwanese   is   only   for   a  lip  service   to   the   Citizenship  of  the   R.O.C.  
                        The   two  former  Presidents  of   R.O.C   ,   Lee  Teng-Hui  and   Chen  Shui-bian   have   made  efforts    to   puch   for  Taiwan Independence   but   lost  the   way   or   the   target  .
                                                                                                    The   Montevideo   Convention , 1933.

The convention sets out the definition, rights and duties of statehood. Most well-known is article 1, which sets out the four criteria for statehood that have sometimes^[who?] been recognized as an accurate statement of customary international law:

The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: (a) a permanent population; (b) a defined territory; (c) government; and (d) capacity to enter into relations with the other states.

Furthermore, the first sentence of article 3 explicitly states that "The political existence of the state is independent of recognition by the other states." This is known as the declarative theory of statehood.
A fundamental remark must be underlined: the conditions of article 1 are limited by article 11, which forbids the use of military force to obtain sovereignty. Article 11 reflected the contemporary Stimson Doctrine, and it is now a fundamental part of international law through article 2 paragraph 4 of the Charter of the United Nations. Article 11 allows a clear distinction between sovereign and puppet states, the latter ones being excluded from international recognition of statehood.
Some have questioned whether these criteria are sufficient, as they allow less-recognized entities like the Republic of China (Taiwan) to claim full status as states. According to the alternative constitutive theory of statehood, a state exists only insofar as it is recognized by other states. It should not be confused with the Estrada doctrine.

                

The R.O.C and The Japanese Coast Guard Cutters exchange water cannon .

                      If  the   R.O.C.  and   Japan   have  a  confrontation   over   disputed   Islands   to    resolve  by  the  way  of   Malitary   force  or   SINO-JAPANESE  war  ,   the   U.S   will   not   support    the   R.O.C  .  according   the  Taiwan   Relation  Act  which  is  only   for   the   division   of   Chinese   Nation  . 
                   The  United  State  would   be   much  on  Japan's   side  according  to   the  U.S.  ,   Japan   security  treaty   of   1960  ,   and   than   under  the   American  military   protection  . 
So!  Think    clearly  .   Do   clearly  !    God   bless   with   you  !

Cannot play media. You do not have the correct version of the flash player. Download the correct version

Advertisement

Footage shows water being sprayed at Taiwanese ships after they entered Japanese waters

Continue reading the main story

Related Stories

• Q&A: China-Japan islands row
• Japan firms stabilise in China Watch
• China puts off Japan ties event

China has warned Japan it will not tolerate violations of its sovereignty, in high-level talks aimed at easing tensions over an islands dispute.

The comments, from Vice Foreign Minister Zhang Zhijun to his Japanese counterpart, were quoted on the Chinese ministry website.
The meeting came as dozens of Taiwanese boats sailed to the islands to protest.
The islands, called Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China, are controlled by Japan but claimed by China and Taiwan.
Tension in the region has been high since Japan's purchase of the islands from their private Japanese owner.
Taiwanese vessels, including coastguard ships, have now left the area.
Chinese surveillance and fishing boats have also been sailing in and out of waters around the islands in recent days, following the Japanese government's announcement that it had bought the islands
               

The Relation of the U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY AND INTEREST .

Two things are almost certain about this year's debate at the UN General Assembly: it will be overshadowed by crises in the Middle East, and world leaders who have descended on New York will not be able to solve them.

They are not even officially on the agenda.
First, there are the roiling anti-American protests caused by the video denigrating the Prophet Muhammad.
The violent reaction in Muslim countries has raised old controversies about the limits of freedom of expression and the right to protection against religious defamation.
And it has raised new concerns about stability in the democracies born of the Arab Spring.
Then, there is the war that the UN cannot stop.
"Syria will be at the top of my agenda," the Secretary General Ban Ki-moon told journalists in a news conference previewing the year's most intense week of diplomacy. "It will be at the top of every leader's mind."
'Permanent paralysis'

Continue reading the main story

“Start Quote

The general feeling that we all have is that we are an audience in front of a tragedy. The two sides are fighting apparently to the death”

End Quote UN Security Council diplomat

That is probably because at this point there is no disguising the fact that Syria is a UN failure.

Divided over whether Syrian President Bashar al-Assad should play any role in a political transition, the Security Council could not reach a common position, let alone take action.
Kofi Annan, the first special envoy tasked with crafting a solution to the crisis, gave up in despair. And his replacement, Lakhdar Brahimi, seems at a loss for a strategy.

                   

The disputed Islands between Japan and China .

                   I   think  that  ,Japan   and  the   US   will    become  allied  to    each   other  in   Asia-Pacific  REGION     to  take   control  China   .    Japan   will   leave   from  Asia   value   countries  for   America  region
western   countries   under   the  shield  of   the   US  .   The   US    would  have   forgotten  the   Cairo   Declaration   in   1943  ,  after  world  war   two  .   If   we   don't   know  the   History   of   the   disputed  Islands   in   South   China   sea   ,  we   should  have  been  cheating   by   them  . 

Disputed Seas

Competing territorial claims have led to maritime disputes off the coast of Asia.

View Interactive

Tensions High Over Asian Islands

Competing territorial claims have led to maritime disputes in the seas around Asia.

View Slideshow

Kyodo/Reuters

The latest flare-up with China followed the Japanese government's purchase from private Japanese owners earlier this month of the islands controlled by Japan but also claimed by China. Japan's nationalization of the islands—known as the Senkaku in Japan, Diaoyu in China—set off anti-Japanese protests in more than 100 cities in China, some violent, leaving a trail of burned-down factories, looted stores and vandalized consulates. The head of a Japanese insurers' industry body has said insurance payments to Japanese companies damaged by the protests could total up to tens of billions of yen.
Beijing also sent paramilitary patrol boats under its various agencies to waters near the islands, setting off a cat-and-mouse chase with the Japanese Coast Guard that has continued for more than a week. On Monday, the Coast Guard said two Chinese vessels entered the islands' territorial waters, an act Tokyo sees as provocative.

Japanese opposition lawmakers have called for beefing up the defenses around the islands. But Mr. Noda said he saw no need to bring in the Japanese navy, and shrugged off the possibility of a military conflict. "It's not good to talk about pessimistic scenarios," the 55-year-old leader said.

Egypt issues arrest warrant for pastor Terry-Jones and seven others over Anti-Islam movie .

                      Anti-Islam  film  protests  in  the  muslim  world  should  be   resolved  by  the  cooperation between  the  US and  the  Muslim  countries  .
                  The   director,   the   producer,  actors, actresses, supporters,the script  write,   the  camera  man,and  others  who   should  be  taken  before   the  law  or   the  ICC  according  to  the   international  law  .
      Would  you  agree   ?   God   bless  with  you   !

Egyptian prosecutors have ordered the arrest of eight people who allegedly helped to make and distribute the anti-Islam movie that sparked protests in Egypt and several other Muslim countries, the Associated Press reported.
They include the man believed to have produced the film, Nassoula Basseley Nakoula, and the US pastor who helped promote it, Terry Jones.
The six others are described as Egyptian Coptic Christians, five of them men and one a woman.
According to the BBC, they are wanted on charges of what the Egyptian prosecutor general called "insulting the Islamic religion, insulting the Prophet and inciting sectarian strife."
The charges carry the death penalty.
More from GlobalPost: Full coverage of the movie controversy
The prosecutor's office said it would notify Interpol and US authorities of the warrants, suggesting that it may seek to extradite the suspects – all of whom are understood to live outside Egypt – for trial.
The AP's Sarah El Deeb sees the case as "largely symbolic," however, a move designed more to absorb Egyptians' anger than result in a conviction.
It is a criminal offense in Egypt to denigrate religion. Just today, the AP has the story of a Coptic Christian who was sentenced to six years in jail for posting drawings on Facebook deemed an affront to the Prophet Muhammad, and for comments said to insult President Mohamed Morsi.
According to Egyptian news site Ahram Online, conservative Islamists are pushing to include a clause outlawing blasphemy in the country's new constitution, which liberals fear could restrict freedom of speech    and  expression .   

Myanmar opposition leader urges end to sanctions

             The   sanctions  have   the  relation with  many   issues  in   Myanmar ,  such   as   political  prisoners ,  ethinic  conflicts  ,  democratic  development  , the   national  reconciliation  and   so  on  .  
The   US  SANCTIONS  would  not   ease  immediately  as   Suu   Kyi's  urge.
  

Democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi backed the lifting of sanctions on Myanmar and reassured China her landmark visit to the United States was not aimed at containing Beijing's influence.

The Nobel peace laureate, who spent 15 years under house arrest, thanked the United States for its years of support but, as she received the first of many accolades on her tour, said that Myanmar must build democracy itself.
"I do not think that we need to cling onto sanctions unnecessarily because I want our people to be responsible for their own destiny and not to depend too much on external props," Suu Kyi said in her trip's first major appearance.
"In the end, we have to build our own democracy," she said in a speech in which she appeared careful not to annoy leaders who have initiated reforms.
The opposition leader had long supported economic sanctions to pressure her jailers, Myanmar's junta, which nominally disbanded last year.
The United States has been rolling back restrictions, in July opening Myanmar up to US investment despite Suu Kyi's earlier unease about US firms doing business with the state-owned oil and gas company.
"There are very many other ways in which the United States can help us to achieve our democratic ends and help us to build up the kind of democratic institutions that we are in such need of. Sanctions are not the only way," Suu Kyi said.
Suu Kyi, now a member of parliament, said she believes President Thein Sein is "keen" on change in the nation formerly known as Burma but cautioned not to look just at the executive branch as the judiciary was reform's "weakest arm."
"We have passed a first hurdle, but there are many more hurdles to cross," she said

Q and A , Anti-Islam Film Protests .

                             It  is  not    a     freedom   of   speech    or   exprees   .   Every   body   should  respect   to   the  value  of  human   being  .   Don't    insult   to   other   religion   of  a  civilization  .  
                        Acording    to   the   proteses   news   of   the   Anti-Muslim  movie     spread   to the  mid-east  region  countries   ,  the   You-Tube  and  the   US   government  would   have   to  take  the   responsibility  of   the   Anii-Muslim   film   .       
                 The   true   value  of   a   human  being   is   determined   -  primarily  the   measure  and the  sense    in   which  he   has   attained  to   liberation  from   the   self  ,
 (  Albert  Einstein   )   . 
            
               How did the film come to public attention?
The video was first posted online on 1 July without attracting much attention. It was later picked up by various Arab TV stations, with religious Egyptian TV channel al-Nas's presenter Sheikh Khalad Abdalla broadcasting scenes on 8 September. A clip from his show, dubbed into Arabic, was posted online and within days had been viewed by hundreds of thousands of people.
The Afghan government says it has blocked YouTube to prevent people from watching it.
White House officials have asked YouTube to consider whether the film breaches its own guidelines. These guidelines include the stipulation: "We encourage free speech and defend everyone's right to express unpopular points of view. But we do not permit hate speech..."
Google, which owns YouTube, said in a statement that the video was "clearly within our guidelines and so will stay on YouTube", but added that "given the very difficult situation in Libya and Egypt" it had restricted access to the video in both countries.
What does the film show?
The video, a trailer for a longer film entitled Innocence of Muslims, appears to depict Islam as a religion of violence and hate, and its Prophet Muhammad as a foolish and power-hungry man.
It opens with a scene in which a Coptic family in a newly radicalised Islamic Egypt is attacked by a group of Muslims while police look on without intervening. The father tells his daughters that Muslims want to kill all Christians and that the Islamic state is hiding their crimes.
It then shows the Prophet Muhammad and his life with his family and his followers in the desert. He is shown having sex with his wife Khadija and other women.
The video implies Khadija is behind the creation of the Koran, which is described as a combination of subversions of the Torah and the New Testament.
The trailer depicts Muhammad and his followers as killers, looters and extortionists. In one scene the Prophet sanctions the sexual abuse of children; in another, he says he is gay.
Why is it so offensive?
Depicting the Prophet Muhammad in any way already defies Islamic belief, let alone satirising him. His wife Khadija and his earliest companions are also revered in their own right in Islam, and so mocking these individuals is also considered serious blasphemy.
The founding principle of Islam is that the Koran is the direct word of God, revealed to Muhammad in order that he impart it to humankind. Depicting Khadija as planning to concoct a holy book out of the Old and New Testament defies an intrinsic Islamic belief.
Other references to Muhammad's affairs with women, his greed and violence would clearly be insulting in any context.

Some Historical Facts for Biography of Bogyoke Aung San .

                              The   picture  or   movie  of  Bogyoke  should  be    the   greatest   master  piece  of   Burmese ( Myanmar )   history 
                           I    want   to   ask   the  executive   board  that ,  ''  Would  you  have  collected   all   relevant   important   films  records  ,documentary    records  , photographic   records  ,   the   movements   of   public  films  or  photoes   records   and   Historical   sites  ,  places  , gardens   ,   parks   around   in   Burma  (  Myanmar  )  ?   
                      All   above   those  records  should   be   showed   for   the  public  in    some   theatres  , cinema   halls  ,  government   information   centres  ,  and   museums  for   a  period   of   time   such  as  one   year  or   more  and   more  .  
                    Don't   forget   the   thirty   comrades ,  BO  kYAW  ZAW   and   BO   YE   HTUT  1 

                 

BIOGRAPHY OF GENERAL AUNG SAN

National Hero of Burma
13th February 1915
Born at Natmauk, a township in Magwe district, central Burma.
1932
Matriculated in the “A” category with distinctions in Burmese and Pali.
1935-36
Elected to the executive committee of the Rangoon University Students’ Union and became the editor of the Students’ Union Magazine.
February 1936
Expelled from the university for publication of the article “Hell Hound at Large” in the union magazine. Expulsion of Ko Aung San and Ko Nu from the university led to the university strike. Later, the government conceded strikers’ demands and retracted expulsion orders.
1938
Elected as president of the Rangoon University Students’ Union and the All Burma Student’s Union. Appointed as a student representative in “Rangoon University Act Amendment Committee” by the government.
October 1938
Joined Dohbama Asi-ayone (“We-Burmese” Organization) and became Thakin Aung San.
1938 to August 1940
Acted as the Head Office General Secretary of Dohbama Asi-ayone.
1938-39
Countrywide strikes known as Revolution of Year 1300 (Burmese calendar year).
1939 to 1940
Helped to found Bama-htwet-yat Ghine (Freedom Bloc) and became the general secretary.
March 1940
Attended Indian National Congress Assembly in Rangar?, India.
1940
Went underground due to arrest warrant issued by the British government.
August 1940
Left for Burma and reached Amoy, China and later to Tokyo, Japan.
February 1941
Came back to Burma with offer of arms and money support from the Japanese for uprising.

1941
Arrived in Japan for military training together with the first batch of the Thirty Comrades.
December 1941
Founded Burmese Independence Army (BIA) in Bangkok, Thailand with the help of the Japanese and became chief-of-staff Major-General Aung San (a.k.a. Bo Teza).
March 1942
Rangoon, capital of Burma, fell to the Japanese Army. The Japanese military administration took over Burma.
July 1942
Reorganized BIA and become Burma Defence Army (BDA). Appointed as Commander-in-Chief Colonel Aung San.
6th September 1942
Married with Daw Khin Kyi.
March 1943
Promoted to become Major-General Aung San of BDA.
1943
Invited to Japan and decorated by the Emperor with “Order of the Rising Sun”.
1st August 1943
Burma was declared an independent nation and Major-General Aung San became the War Minister.
1943
BDA was renamed as Burma National Army (BNA).
November 1943
The British troops hiding in hills of Burma received Aung San’s plan to turn his forces against the Japanese.
1st August 1944
Declared Burma’s independence status as fake in independence day anniversary speech.
August 1944
Founded Anti-Fascist Organization (AFO) and became the military leader of the organization.
27th March 1945
Burmese troops throughout the country rose up against the Japanese.
15th May 1945
Met with William Slim of the Fourteenth Army.
15th June 1945
Victory parade was held in Rangoon. The Burmese forces participated alongside the British and Allied forces.
August 1945
The Japanese forces surrendered.
August 1945
AFO was expanded and renamed as Anti-Fascist People’s Freedom League (AFPFL).
1945
BNA was renamed as Patriotic Burmese Forces (PBF).
September 1945
Signed an agreement to merge PBF with Burma Army under British command during a meeting in Kandy, Ceylon.
October 1945
Civil government was restored with Dorman-Smith as the governor of Burma.
January 1946
Elected as president of the AFPFL.
September 1946
Appointed as Deputy Chairman of the Executive Council of Burma with portfolios for defence and external affairs.
2nd January 1947
Met with Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru of India in New Delhi, India during his way to London.
27th January 1947
Signed “Aung San-Attlee Agreement” in London guaranteeing Burma’s independence within a year.
June 1947
Convened series of conferences at the Sorrenta Villa in Rangoon for rehabilitation of the country.
13th July 1947
Gave last public speech urging Burmese people to mend their ways and urge them for more discipline.
19th July 1947
Assassinated during the Executive Council meeting together with six other Councillors, including his elder brother, U Ba Win. U Saw, a former Prime Minister, was found guilty of the abetment and executed.
4th January 1948
Burma regained its independence.
More information here.
                                

                                

                 

China show disapproval to Clinton on South China Sea .

                      A  code   of  conduct  is  a  set  of  rules  outline  ,  the   responsibilities  or   proper practics   for    an   individual   ,   party   or  organization  . 
                     The  six  countries  ,   the  PRC,  the  ROC  (   Taiwan  )   ,   the   Vietnam ,  the  Malaysia  ,the   Philipine  and   the  Brunei  claim  the   Islands   of  South   China   Sea  . 
                  Clinton   urges  to   resolve   the  disputes  without   coercion,   intimidation  ,and  the  use  of   force   .  That   is   the  coercion  from  the   US   whose    idea   likes   this ,   ''Don't   do   as   I  do  ,  Do   as  I  say  .'' 
                  This  road   should   not   be   gone  !   It    has   many   twiists  and   turns  .
                Uncle Sam  !    Would  you  think  !   Every   body   fault  but  yours   ? 
            God   bless   with  you  !   Thanks  your  suggestions   ! 
                                                                                                                     “Generally speaking, our relationship has been moving forward, but recently I am more or less worried,” Premier Wen Jiabao told Clinton in a slow, measured voice, deviating from the usual empty pleasantries of official Chinese meetings. “I feel that our two countries should maintain political mutual respect and strategic mutual trust. The United States should respect China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.”
In his sharp comments, made in front of a handful of reporters at the beginning of Wen’s meeting with Clinton, the premier blamed the United States for the troubles between the two countries.
With his mention of “sovereignty,” Wen was alluding to territorial disputes between China and its neighbors that have intensified dramatically in recent months. On the South China Sea especially, China has been the most aggressive actor, claiming almost the entire disputed area.
China has expressed increasing suspicion and resentment at the growing U.S. involvement in the Asia-Pacific region and has taken issue with Clinton and others who have pushed on behalf of smaller Asian nations for peaceful, collaborative negotiations.
Divisions on display
The disagreements between Clinton’s delegation and the Chinese were so deep that her first meeting Tuesday night, which was with Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi and had been scheduled to last an hour, stretched into a four-hour marathon that ended at 1 a.m.
The next day, the divisions on Syria, Iran and North Korea also were evident.

• Continued
• 1

        

• 2         

Why US halts training of some Afghan Forces

                          It  was  first  reported   by   the  Washington  Post  . I   think  ,  The   Afghan  security   forces  and  Taliban  may   have  a  common  target  over  the  US  led   coalition   forces  .  The  Militants   or   Talibans   would  have   penetrated  into  the   Afghan  Army  and  Afghan  Local  Polices  ( ALP ) .   It  is   a   very   dangerous  for   US  Allies  .  The  training  plan  will be   failed   . Take    care   by  yourself  !  Mr.  Uncle   San  !    God   bless   with  you   ! 
  

Afghan Local Police (ALP) listen to a speech during a ceremony presenting new uniforms at Gizab village of Uruzgan province, Afghanistan, April 24, 2011. (AP Photo/Kamran Jebreili)

(CBS/AP) KABUL, Afghanistan - The U.S. military has suspended training of some Afghan forces while the Americans review the process of vetting new recruits following a spike in deadly attacks on international troops last month, officials said Sunday.

There have been 34 attacks by Afghan police or soldiers on their international allies so far this year — at least 12 in August alone. The members of the Afghan security forces have killed 45 international troops, putting intense strain on the relationship.

The attacks have complicated a key pillar in the plan for the U.S.-led coalition to withdraw by the end of 2014 — training Afghan forces to take the lead in securing their own country.

Lt. Col. Todd Harrell, a spokesman for U.S. special operations forces in Afghanistan, said the Americans have halted training for at least a month of about 1,000 trainees of the Afghan Local Police (ALP), a government-backed militia that is under the authority of the national police but operates independently. He said the Americans are redoing background checks on the Afghans.

"The training of the ALP recruits has been paused while we go through this re-vetting process to take a look at this process to see if there's anything that we can improve," Harrell said. "It may take a month. It may take two months. We don't know."

The United States and its allies have been training the Afghan army and police so that they can gradually take over security for the country by the end 2014. They hope to have about 350,000 Afghans trained and ready by the end of the year, and gradually have been putting them in the lead for security in parts of Afghanistan since last year.

Coalition authorities have said about 25 percent of this year's insider attacks had confirmed or suspected links to the Taliban. The militants have sometimes infiltrated the ranks of the Afghan army and police and in other cases are believed to have coerced or otherwise persuaded legitimate members to turn on their coalition partners

                      

The Moral Courage of Desmond M .Tutu .

                          I  intentionally  support  that  News  to   share  for   the  World  .  Thank  !   .   God   bless   with   you  ! 
                   Tutu Calls for Trial of Bush and Blair

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Published: September 2, 2012

• Facebook
• Twitter
• Google+
• E-mail
• Share
• Print
• Reprints
• 

Connect With Us on Twitter

Follow @nytimesworld for international breaking news and headlines.

Twitter List: Reporters and Editors

LONDON (AP) — The Nobel laureate Desmond M. Tutu called Sunday for former President George W. Bush and former Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain to face prosecution at the International Criminal Court for their role in the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

Archbishop Tutu, the Anglican archbishop emeritus of Cape Town, wrote in the British newspaper The Observer that the two former leaders should be made to “answer for their actions.”

The Iraq war “has destabilized and polarized the world to a greater extent than any other conflict in history,” wrote Archbishop Tutu.

“Those responsible for this suffering and loss of life should be treading the same path as some of their African and Asian peers who have been made to answer for their actions in The Hague,” he added 

Myanmar Peace Centre Meeting ( 2012/9/2 )

                                I   think  , it  has   a   relation  with  the   UN  Security   Council ( sc/9136)   ,  as  below  .
                            

ျပန္လာတဲ့ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံေရး အင္အားစု ေခါင္းေဆာင္ေတြနဲ႔ သမၼတရံုးဝန္ႀကီးမ်ား ေတြ႔ဆုံ

2012-09-02

သမၼတရံုးဝန္ႀကီးေတြ ျဖစ္ၾကတဲ့ ျပည္ေထာင္စုဝန္ႀကီး ဦးစိုးသိမ္း၊ ဦးေအာင္မင္းနဲ႔ ဒုတိယဝန္ႀကီး ဦးေအာင္သိမ္း တို႔ဟာ ျပည္ပက ျပန္လာတဲ့ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံေရး အင္အားစု ေခါင္းေဆာင္ေတြနဲ႔ ရန္ကုန္ၿမိဳ႕ ေရႊလီလမ္း၊ ဗဟန္း ၿမိဳ႕နယ္မွာရွိတဲ့ Myanmar Peace Centre မွာ ဒီကေန႔ ေတြ႕ဆံုခဲ့တယ္လို႔ သိရပါတယ္။

Photo courtesy of U Hla Maung Shwe Facebook

သမၼတရံုးဝန္ႀကီးေတြ ျဖစ္ၾကတဲ့ ျပည္ေထာင္စုဝန္ႀကီး ဦးစိုးသိမ္း၊ ဦးေအာင္မင္းနဲ႔ ဒုတိယဝန္ႀကီး ဦးေအာင္သိမ္းတုိ႔နဲ႔ ျပည္ပက ျပန္လာတဲ့ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံေရး အင္အားစု ေခါင္းေဆာင္ေတြျဖစ္တဲ့ ေဒါက္တာႏိုင္ေအာင္၊ ေဒါက္တာေသာင္းထြန္း၊ ဦးညိဳအုန္းျမင့္၊ ဦးမိုးသီးဇြန္၊ ဦးထြန္းေအာင္ေက်ာ္၊ ဦးရင္ေအး အပါအ၀င္ ေက်ာင္းသားတပ္မေတာ္ ေခါင္းေဆာင္ေဟာင္း တစ္ခ်ိဳ႕ ရန္ကုန္ၿမိဳ႕ ေရႊလီလမ္း၊ ဗဟန္း ၿမိဳ႕နယ္မွာရွိတဲ့ Myanmar Peace Centre မွာ ၂၀၁၂ ခုႏွစ္ စက္တင္ဘာလ ၂ ရက္ေန႔က ေတြ႕ဆံုခဲ့ၾကစဥ္။

ဒီကေန႔ ေတြ႕ဆံုပြဲမွာ စီးပြားေရး ျပဳျပင္ေျပာင္းလဲမႈ၊ ႏိုင္ငံတည္ေဆာက္ေရး၊ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရး လုပ္ငန္းစဥ္ စတဲ့ အေၾကာင္းအရာေတြကို အဓိက ေဆြးေႏြးျဖစ္ခဲ့ၾကတယ္လုိ႔ ေဆြးေႏြးပြဲ တက္ေရာက္ခဲ့တဲ့ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရး အက်ိဳးေတာ္ေဆာင္ ဦးလွေမာင္ေရႊ က RFA ကို ေျပာပါတယ္။
"အဓိက ေဆြးေႏြးတဲ့ အေၾကာင္းရင္းေတြကေတာ့ ႏုိင္ငံမွာ ဒီ peace process, က်န္းမာေရးတုိ႔ ပညာေရးတုိ႔၊ လူသားအရင္းအျမစ္ ဖြံ႔ျဖိဳးေရးတုိ႔၊ ပူးေပါင္းေဆာင္ရြက္ႏုိင္မႈတုိ႔ အဲဒါေတြ အဓိက ေဆြးေႏြးျဖစ္တယ္။ ေတာ္ေတာ္ေလး ေႏြးေႏြးေထြးေထြးနဲ႔ ပြင့္ပြင့္လင္းလင္း ေဆြးေႏြးျဖစ္တယ္။ ယုံၾကည္မႈ ပုိရလာတယ္။ ပူးေပါင္းေဆာင္ရြက္ႏုိင္မယ့္ နည္းလမ္းေတြလည္း ပုိရလာတယ္လုိ႔ ကၽြန္ေတာ့္အေနနဲ႔ ယုံၾကည္တယ္။ သူတုိ႔အေနနဲ႔လည္း နယ္စပ္မွာ အၾကာၾကီးေနခဲ့ေတာ့ လက္နက္ကုိင္အဖြဲ႔ေတြနဲ႔ ထုိက္သင့္သေလာက္ ယုံၾကည္မႈေတြ ရွိမွာပါ။ ဒါေၾကာင့္ ဒီ peace process မွာေတာ့ သူတုိ႔လည္း တတပ္တအားအေနနဲ႔ ပါ၀င္ေပးၾကပါတယ္။"
ႏွစ္နာရီနီးပါး ၾကာျမင့္တဲ့ အဲဒီေတြ႕ဆံုပြဲကုိ FDB ေခၚ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံ ဒီမိုကေရစီ အင္အားစုအဖြဲ႔ရဲ႕ အေထြေထြ အတြင္းေရးမွဴး ေဒါက္တာႏိုင္ေအာင္၊ NCGUB ျပည္ေထာင္စု ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံ အေဝးေရာက္ အမ်ိဳးသား ညြန္႔ေပါင္းအစိုးရအဖြဲ႔ ကုလသမဂၢဆိုင္ရာ တာဝန္ခံေဟာင္း ေဒါက္တာေသာင္းထြန္း၊ NLD(LA) ရဲ႕ျပန္ၾကားေရး တာဝန္ခံေဟာင္း ဦးညိဳအုန္းျမင့္၊ ABSDF ေက်ာင္းသားတပ္မေတာ္ ဥကၠ႒ေဟာင္းေတြ ျဖစ္တဲ့ ဦးမိုးသီးဇြန္၊ ဦးထြန္းေအာင္ေက်ာ္တို႔ အပါအဝင္ ေက်ာင္းသားတပ္မေတာ္ ေခါင္းေဆာင္ေဟာင္း တစ္ခ်ိဳ႕လည္း တက္ေရာက္ခဲ့ၾကပါတယ္။
ဒီကေန႔ ေတြ႕ဆံုပြဲနဲ႔ ပတ္သက္ျပီး NCGUB ျပည္ေထာင္စု ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံ အေဝးေရာက္ အမ်ိဳးသား ညြန္႔ေပါင္းအစိုးရအဖြဲ႔ ကုလသမဂၢဆိုင္ရာ တာဝန္ခံေဟာင္း ေဒါက္တာေသာင္းထြန္းကုိ RFA ဦးတင္ေအာင္ခုိင္က ဆက္သြယ္ေမးျမန္းထားပါတယ္။

	ဆက္သြယ္ေမးျမန္းခ်က္။
	အသံဖိုင္ယူရန္။

                           

The 16th Summit of Non-Align Movement .

                       It  is   taken from  Wikipedia  ,  
Ministerial Meeting
The Ministerial Meeting with presence of foreign ministers of NAM countries was held on 28 and 29 August 2012. Egypt's Deputy Foreign Minister, Ramzy Ezzeldin Ramzy, handed the presidency of the ministerial meeting for three years at the opening ceremony of the meeting. ^[65] After opening remark of Ali Akbar Salehi and listening to the report of Senior Officials Meeting which was delivered by Mohammad Mehdi Akhondzadeh, the ministers starts to review the document. ^[66] After preparation of the final document for the leaders summit, Ali Akbar Salehi participated in a press conference and emphasized on the four main topics that were discussed at the meeting including establishment a task force in New York to pursue Palestine's membership in the United Nations and act against Israel's "illegal" measures against Palestinians, finding solution for Syrian crisis with United Nations cooperation, acting against monopolizing of the financial mechanisms in the world by using US dollar and finally establishment of a work group in New York to study the mechanisms of plural management of the world .^[67]

[edit] Leaders' Summit

World leaders at the summit

On 30 August the summit inaugurated by Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Then Egypt President, Mohammad Morsi, as the chair of the 15th summit declared opening of the 16th summit and presented the report of NAM's chairmanship during the past three years. Then officially handed the presidency of the Non-Aligned Movement to Iran President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. After Morsi, President of the Sixty-sixth session of the United Nations General Assembly Nassir Abdulaziz Al-Nasser, Secretary-General Ban Ki Mon, Chair of the Group of 77 Mourad Benmehidi, host President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh delivered their opening speeches.^[68] He also later said the members of NAM have more of a right to solve the Syrian crisis than does the UN or western countries.^[69]
Inaugurating the summit, Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei condemned the use of nuclear and chemical weapons as an "unforgivable sin", and called for "Middle East Free from Nuclear Weapons".^[70] Khamanei argued that it was ironic for the US to oppose nuclear proliferation while, according to Khamanei, it possessed the largest stockpile of nuclear weapons and had used them in the past. He also accused the US and its Western allies of providing Israel with nuclear weapons.^[71] He criticized the UN Security Council as "unjust" and "undemocratic" and accused the US of abusing it.^[72] Other Iranian officials stated that the Security Council had more power than the General Assembly and criticized the veto rights of its permanent members.^[73] Khamenei accused the United States of protecting the interests of the Western countries in the name of "human rights", interfering militarily in other countries in the name of "democracy", and targeting civilians in the name of "combating terrorism". A day after U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon asked Khamenei to lower his rhetoric on Israel,^[72] Khamanei accused Israel of assassinations, waging wars, killing people and occupying Arab territories. He referred to the Palestinians as "people who have stood up to fight for their rights." Khamenei also proposed impoving the "political productivity" of the Non-Aligned Movement in global governance and called for a "historic document", an active secretariat, and administrative tools to achieve this. He also called for economic cooperation and for cultural relationships between NAM members.^{[74][75][76][77][78][79][80]}
Following Khamenei's remarks, the United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon, who was described as visibly irritated,^[81] denounced Iran's position towards Israel in his opening speech. He said it was "utterly wrong" to describe Israel in "racist terms" or to deny its right to exist. He further called Holocaust denial "outrageous".^[80][82][83] Ki-Moon called on both Iran and Israel to stop making threats against the other.^[80] While describing Iran's cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency as "constructive and useful,"^[84] Ban Ki-Moon demanded that Iran boost global confidence in its nuclear program by "fully complying with the relevant (UN) Security Council resolutions and thoroughly cooperating with the IAEA."^[81]
Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi denounced the Syrian government, an ally of Iran, calling it "oppressive" and said that it was an "ethical duty" to support the Syrian revolt against the Bashar al-Assad government.^[85] Walid al-Moallem, Syrian foreign minister, walked out in protest, although Mahmoud Ahmadinejad remained seated beside Morsi.^[86] Morsi called for a peaceful transition to freedom and democracy in Syria.^[87] Like Iran, Morsi also called for reform in the structure of the UN Security Council.^[86] Morsi echoed Iranian calls for a nuclear-free Middle East,^[86] and criticized Israel for refusing to join the Non-Proliferation Treaty.^[88] Morsi and Iran also both supported the Palestinian bid for a seat at the UN.^[86][89] At the summit Egypt's Mohammed Morsi also handed over the leadership of the body to Iran for the next three years.^[90]
Indian Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, called for a peaceful resolution of the crisis in Syria and pledged support for the Palestinian movement. He also called for reform in the UN Security Council, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.^[91] The summit also drew up a draft resolution on ending the Syrian conflict.^[92]