Overview of Injunction Approved , for Wang's Plaintiff .

Wang offers kind words as struggle goes

Injunction   is    a   temporary  continual   exercing   Wang's   right   as   KMT   member  but   not  a  solution   of   his   plaintiff  . 
              KMT's  counterappeal   will   be   a   counter   claim   which  is   a  course  or  action   or  claim   for   relief  asserted  by   a   defendant   against   the   plaintiff  in   a  civil   case  .  
            The    defendant   may  assert   such   a   claim   as    a   counter   claim  
or   hold   it  for  a   separate  action  which   may   be   a   criminal   action   or    civil   action  .
       Ma  ,yesterday  said  that  revoking   Wang's   KMT  membership   is   about   legal  
manner  instead  of   political    struggle   .
      So  ,  It   is   either   political   comspiracy  or  violation  of   Public    Servants,  Law 
which  has   become  an   issue   for   Ma  and  Wang  . 
      Whether   Wang  will  clean   politician   as   a   public         servant   or   against    the   Public   Jaustice  ,  ...................  To   be   continued       

 

The Politicians Corruption and Judiciary Corruption are bursting in Taiwan .

Presidential Office spokesman resigns
            Yes,   that   is  enough   by  a   Professor  says   like  this  :
   Liu   Yi-jun   , a  public    affair   professor   at   Fo  Guang  University   in   Taiwan  ,  says  "People  in  Taiwan  Generally  suapect   the   judiciary   and   elected  officials  .......
" I  think  right   now  the   problems   usually   focus  on    the    elected   officials  ,  "

The  NEWS   FROM   VOA ++++++++

Ralph Jennings

September 12, 2013

TAIPEI — Taiwan is stepping up anti-corruption efforts to improve its image at home and among offshore investors. The government in Taipei has banned bribery, pledged to follow up daily citizen complaints about graft and make it easier for foreign companies to report wrongdoing.

Taiwan, an old manufacturing base and the 26th largest economy, today competes against China, South Korea and Southeast Asia for new investment. But in July, the nongovernmental group Transparency International said perceptions of judicial, legislative and political party graft in Taiwan had exceeded global averages. It said the perceptions also had worsened since 2010.

Taiwan rejects the Berlin-based NGO’s findings as excessive, but officials acknowledge growing public anger about corruption and fear that investors will be deterred. Chu Kung-mao, director-general of the Justice Ministry’s two-year-old Agency Against Corruption, has commissioned a poll for later this month to gauge public opinion on the issue. He says the poll, carried out by Transparency International’s Taipei chapter, is aimed at building confidence in Taiwanese investors who have moved offshore.

He says the main reason is to offer a clean environment and make Taiwanese investors want to return from offshore without worrying that public servants will ask them for money. He says the agency is doing both administrative and substantive work, including letting people know where graft complaints stand, to make the public service climate cleaner. In that way, he adds, businesses local and foreign will want to invest.

Chu’s agency, part of a democratic government that prides itself on a reliable business climate, looks into every complaint from the public. It has reported receiving 5,937 allegations since 2011. On top of those, the agency has launched 2,190 inquiries into corruption practices based on in-house information.

The agency also increasingly warns officials about potential breaches before they happen.

Two years ago the government outlawed bribery, including small transactions such as buying tea for a customs agent. By the end of this year it will meet with multinational firms about graft and give them a special channel to voice any complaints.

Liu Yi-jiun, a public affairs professor at Fo Guang University in Taiwan, says people in Taiwan generally suspect the judiciary and elected officials.

“What I see is that most of the people still have very little confidence in judicial independence. Civil servants, I think they are fine. I think right now the problems usually focus on the elected officials,” says Liu Yi-jiun.

Transparency International found that perceptions of judicial bribery in Taiwan had risen from 12 to 36 percent since 2010, putting Taiwan on a level with Ghana and Mozambique. The NGO’s Global Corruption Barometer also gave low marks to Taiwan’s legislature and political parties.

In a case just this week, Taiwan’s ruling Nationalist Party expelled parliament speaker Wang Jin-pyng over suspicion of influence peddling. But Chu’s agency says the largest share of corruption in Taiwan stems from government procurement, with 164 cases since 2011, and construction contracts with 137. Those cases often involve local officials with small budgets.

  

UN says Syria attack videos fake: Russia

UN says Syria attack videos fake: Russia

British  Government   will   take  part   in   the   US   military    Action  in   Syria   ,  although  the   British  Pailiament  Voted   against  it   last   month  ,in   August .
Britain  has   fourgh  along  side   the   US    in   Afghanistan  ,   Iraq  ,along   with   France   on  the  intervention  in  Libya   in   2011  .  Obama  or    Maccain   has   not   really  known  about   in   Syria   Civil  War  which  cannot   be   limited  in   Military  Strikes  or   Actions  . 
      Would   you  think   about   the   Maccain's  words  :  "   So  I  want  to   begin  by   saying  to   you   that  I  am  unalterably  opposed   to   having  a   singal  American   boot  on   the   ground  in   Syria  "   It  is   only  a  lip   service  or   try   to   make  a   big   Lie  which    is   without   accordence  with   the   Laws  . 
     Mr.  Obama  talks   so   much ,  tells   too   hard  ,   and   speaks  without   perception  or   ability  .You   are  Fire  in  the  International  Community   .  Please  !  drop   your  coercing  power  in   the   international  relationship  .  God   bless   with   you  !  . 

Please  !   Give   Attention   : 
++++++++++++++++++

The US has said it will wait for details of a Russian proposal on Syrian chemical weapons but warned it would not permit "delays and avoidance".

US Secretary of State John Kerry said the plan must be "swift and verifiable" and warned its implementation would be "exceedingly difficult".
Syria has said it accepts the Russian plan to put the chemical weapons under international control.
The US, UK and France will table a UN Security Council resolution later.
France earlier said the resolution would be strong and call for the control and subsequent destruction of the chemical weapons.
Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said the resolution would threaten "extremely serious" consequences if Syria breached its conditions.
The US alleges that Syrian government forces carried out a chemical weapons attack in Damascus on 21 August, killing 1,429 people.
The Syrian government blames the attack on rebels fighting to overthrow President Bashar al-Assad, in a conflict that the UN says has claimed some 100,000 lives.
'Hard look'
Mr Kerry said that if the UN were used as the vehicle for pursuing the Russian plan, it must not become a debating society.

Continue reading the main story

Chapter 7 of UN Charter

• Action in response to threats to peace, breaches of peace and acts of aggression
• Article 41 enables Security Council to decide measures not involving armed force
• Can suspend economic and diplomatic relations as well as rail, sea and other communications
• If Article 41 measures are inadequate, Article 42 enables Security Council to take action by air, sea or land forces for international peace and security

Source: UN

He told a hearing of the House of Representatives Armed Services Committee the US was waiting for details of the Russian proposal, "but we're not waiting for long".

He said: "President Obama will take a hard look at it. But it has to be swift, it has to be real, it has to be verifiable.
"We have to show Syria, Russia and the world we are not going to fall for stalling tactics."
Mr Kerry urged Congress to stand by Mr Obama, saying the president was not asking for a declaration of war, simply for the power to show that the US "means what we say".
There have been few details so far of Russia's plan, but Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said earlier in Moscow that it was "preparing a concrete proposal which will be presented to all interested sides, including the US... a workable, specific, concrete plan".
Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem, who is in Moscow, was quoted by Russian news agency Interfax as saying: "We held a very fruitful round of talks with [Mr Lavrov] yesterday and he proposed an initiative relating to chemical weapons. And in the evening, we agreed to the Russian initiative."
This would "remove the grounds for American aggression", he said.
The US Senate had been expected to vote this week on a resolution authorising military force, but the Russian plan has led to a postponement.

The responsibility of the Military Strike on Syria should be over Barack Obama . .....

Syria hails 'historic American retreat' as Obama hesitates

             All  actions   start  somewhere  . Thay  are  best   controlled   at    the  start  .  If   you  can  block  the   though  that  leads  to   a  Dishonest   ,   you    will  block   the   deed   itself  . (  Norman  Vircent  Peale  . )
            One  of   the   test  of   Leadership  is   the  Ability   to   recoginze   a  problem 
before  it  becomes  an  Emergency  .  (  Arnold  H. Glasgow  ) 
           Why   did  the   US  President   Barack   Obama  delay  on  Military  Strike   by  deciding   to   consult  congress  ? 
           He   did   not  know  the   injury   that   he   has   done   and  the   one  his   Suffering   are   not   weighed   in   the   same   Scale  .
         The   Law-makers  in   the  Congress   of   the   US    who   stand   for   the   Military  Action  will   be   punished  by   American   People  in   the   comming   election  surely  .
         The   Congress   of   the   US  either  stands  for  the  Military  Action  or   against  which     has  no   effect  over   the   Responsibility  because  it  is   only   upon  the  President  of  the   US  .
       Mr.  President  !  Would   you   order   the   Force  of  the   US  to   take   the  Military  Action  on   Syria  ?   God   bless   with  you  !       The  biggest  game  of   the   US   President .

President Obama has taken the biggest gamble of his presidency.

His decision to put off an attack on Syria and seek authorisation from Congress apparently stunned some of his closest advisers.
Secretary of State John Kerry has defended the president's abrupt change of approach, telling NBC: "He didn't think it was worthwhile acting and having the Syrians and a whole bunch of other folks looking at the United States arguing about whether or not it was legitimate, or should he have done it, or should he have moved faster."
But that is precisely what will happen for at least the next 10 days. There's lots of criticism already and a lot of rehashing of how he got to this position.
Only on Friday, the Secretary of State went out on a limb stressing what was at stake for the world and America's reputation. It is hard to imagine that he's best pleased that Assad's punishment has been put on hold.
If Congress votes "No", his words will come back to haunt him and Obama.
That could happen: victory is by no means assured, particularly in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives. Perhaps the Senate isn't safe either - this will be a free vote and there'll be no formal attempt by party leaders to persuade their colleagues.
After receiving a lengthy classified intelligence briefing on Capitol Hill, several senators and congressmen seemed unconvinced.
The draft resolution from the White House calls for authorisation for action to "deter, disrupt, prevent and degrade" Syria's ability to use chemical weapons: two senators - one Republican, one Democrat - called that too open-ended.
Republican Senator John McCain, who has been leading the demand for military intervention in Syria, said that there was "no strategy, no plan" - and both were needed before he'd back the motion.
If Congress doesn't back him, it will be disastrous for the president.
His decision to call for a vote will look foolish and he would be left with an appalling choice.
Ignore the vote and enrage Congress and many Americans. Or don't strike and live with John Kerry's words that America will be weakened, petty dictators emboldened and history's judgement harsh on America's leaders.
So everything hangs on Obama winning the vote. But even if he does, the delay gives Assad more time to prepare for the blow.
The decision has left many commentators questioning his leadership and asking how Obama managed to box himself in.
But to have taken action without the UN, without the UK, without Congress and without the American people's support would have been very uncomfortable for a man who came to office vowing to end America's foreign wars.

President Obama has taken the biggest gamble of his presidency.

His decision to put off an attack on Syria and seek authorisation from Congress apparently stunned some of his closest advisers.
Secretary of State John Kerry has defended the president's abrupt change of approach, telling NBC: "He didn't think it was worthwhile acting and having the Syrians and a whole bunch of other folks looking at the United States arguing about whether or not it was legitimate, or should he have done it, or should he have moved faster."
But that is precisely what will happen for at least the next 10 days. There's lots of criticism already and a lot of rehashing of how he got to this position.
Only on Friday, the Secretary of State went out on a limb stressing what was at stake for the world and America's reputation. It is hard to imagine that he's best pleased that Assad's punishment has been put on hold.
If Congress votes "No", his words will come back to haunt him and Obama.
That could happen: victory is by no means assured, particularly in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives. Perhaps the Senate isn't safe either - this will be a free vote and there'll be no formal attempt by party leaders to persuade their colleagues.
After receiving a lengthy classified intelligence briefing on Capitol Hill, several senators and congressmen seemed unconvinced.
The draft resolution from the White House calls for authorisation for action to "deter, disrupt, prevent and degrade" Syria's ability to use chemical weapons: two senators - one Republican, one Democrat - called that too open-ended.
Republican Senator John McCain, who has been leading the demand for military intervention in Syria, said that there was "no strategy, no plan" - and both were needed before he'd back the motion.
If Congress doesn't back him, it will be disastrous for the president.
His decision to call for a vote will look foolish and he would be left with an appalling choice.
Ignore the vote and enrage Congress and many Americans. Or don't strike and live with John Kerry's words that America will be weakened, petty dictators emboldened and history's judgement harsh on America's leaders.
So everything hangs on Obama winning the vote. But even if he does, the delay gives Assad more time to prepare for the blow.
The decision has left many commentators questioning his leadership and asking how Obama managed to box himself in.
But to have taken action without the UN, without the UK, without Congress and without the American people's support would have been very uncomfortable for a man who came to office vowing to end America's foreign wars.

The Issue of the Chemical Weapons Attacks in Syria .

Syria expects US-led attack 'at any moment'

             Obama    says   too   much  about  the   Chemical  Weapons   Attack   in   Syria  :
             Atrocity   must  have   response  ! 
            Syria's   use  of   Chemical  Weapons   is   threat   to  the   US  interests !
            Syria   Action   would   be  limited   ,  No  decision   yet  ! 
           The   US  must   not   turn    " a  bline  eye  to  it  .( the  Chemical  Weapons  attack  ) 
          I   have   confidence  in   a  report  from   the  US  intelligence  ..........
I  don't  feel   complelled   to   await  the   out  come  of   the   UN  Probe  .

          All   of   above   his  speech  may   have   threatened  the   The  Demoratic   Society   of   the   US  .
              
        Who will   be  the  Witness  of   his   policy   to   strike   Syria   ? 
       Mr. David  Comeron ,  British  Priminister  .
     Mr. Hollande   ,  the   presidemt  of  France  .
    The  Republican  Leaders  IN  the  House  ,  the   Congress   of   the  US.
     The   Vice   President   of   the   US  . 
     Some  opposition   groups   in  Syria  Civil  War  ,  Free   Syria   Army  . 
    
    As  a  Commander   in   Chief  ,  Mr.  Obama   has   the  Constitutional  Authority   to  order  military  action  without  the  backing  of   the  Congress . 
           Who   did   it  ?  (  the  chemical   weapons  attack )
It  is  either  the  US   and  the  opposition  groups  of   the   Syria   Government   or  the   Syrian Regime  which  has  no   legal  evidence   to  confirm.
 
Don't  forget  that  Germany  and  Canada   ruled   out   joining   any  Strikes
            God   bless   with   you   ! 
                      

Dan Robinson ++++++++++++++++++++

August 31, 2013

WHITE HOUSE — U.S. President Barack Obama has delayed an expected military strike against Syria, instead telling Americans he will seek congressional approval to punish the Syrian government for its alleged use of chemical weapons.

In a Saturday address at the White House, Obama said he has decided the United States should take military action against Syrian government targets, saying that while he holds authority to order a strike, he thinks it is important for the country to have a debate on the issue.

The president ruled out any action that would put American ground troops in Syria, and called what happened in Damascus nearly two weeks ago the worst chemical weapons attack of the 21st century, adding that the U.S. must not turn a "blind eye" to it.

Obama has said he has confidence in a report from the U.S. intelligence community that indicated the Syrian government of President Bashar al Assad was responsible for the attack, referring to an unclassified document that directly blames the government for planning and carrying out the August 21 chemical attack that, the document says, killed at least 1,429 Syrians, including 426 children.

Calling the attack "an assault on human dignity," Obama said not responding risks making a mockery of the global prohibition on the use of chemical weapons, and that he does not feel compelled to await the outcome of the U.N. probe.

"I am comfortable going forward without the approval of a United Nations Security Council that, so far, has been completely paralyzed and unwilling to hold Assad accountable," he added.

The Syrian government has denied having any role in chemical weapons attacks and threatened to retaliate and defend itself against any foreign military attack. Syrian allies expressed support for the Assad government.

As he spoke in the White House Rose Garden, protesters outside the grounds chanted and waved signs to voice opposition to U.S. military intervention in Syria.

"We don’t think that the U.S. should be judge, jury and executioner in this situation, and that a U.S military intervention will not assist in bringing peace to the region, it will only further inflame war," said Eugene Puryear of the Answer Coalition, which is protesting any U.S. intervention in Syria. "So, regardless of the chemical weapons situation, we’re saying U.S. intervention is not the answer."

Heba Boustany was with a group supporting Syrian rebels and calling for action.

“We don’t exactly want intervention with bombs and missiles and everything, we just want someone to at least acknowledge that [President Bashar al-Assad] used chemical weapons and to say something about it and tell him ‘no more.’ Just make him scared to do anything more, because if you don’t say anything to him, he’s going to keep on using it.”

     

Morsi will fall away with Muslim Brotherhood.

             Morsi   had  won  Egypt   Presidential  Election  ,  stood  as  the Freedom  and  Justic  Party  Candidate  on  24  June  2012  .
           He   threw  away  the   Democratic  Tough   Stone  which  cannot  be   used   for  test   his   promise  , which  to   build  a  democratic  , civil  and  modern  state   that   guaranteed   the   freedom of   religion   and   right   to  peaceful protest  .
                                                                                                                                                                                                            
    Morsi's  biggest  stupid   mistake  was  that  , he   temporarily  granted  himself  unlimited   power to  legislate  without  judicial   over   -right  or  review  of  his  Acts   ,  inlate  November   2012  .
          But   on   8,  December  2012  , Morsi   annulled   his  decree   but    too  late   to  face  million  of   people   took  to   the   street  to  demand  Morsi's   Resignnation  on   30  June  2013  .
        On   3  July   at  21:00  (  GMT + 2 )  Abdul  al-si  announced  a   rode  map for  the   future  ,  stating  that  Morsi  was  removed  and  the  hade  of  the   constitutional  court  had   been   appointed  the  interim   President  of   Egypt   .  But  Muslim  Brotherhood   din't  accept   the   army's  road-map  to   an  Islamist  Democratic  Country  which  the   Armforce's  democratic   Idealism  for   the   Egyptian   People  as  I   think  , Amen   ! 
  

VOA News

August 24, 2013

Three top leaders of Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood are set to appear in court on Sunday.

The Islamist group's spiritual leader, Mohamed Badie, and two of his deputies will face charges of inciting deadly violence during the protests that preceded the army's overthrow of President Mohamed Morsi.

Badie has been seen by some as the driving force behind the presidency of Mr. Morsi, who was ousted by Egypt's military July 3 after days of large-scale demonstrations by Egyptians unhappy with his rule.

Meanwhile on Saturday, Egyptian authorities reopened the border between Egypt and Gaza, after a five-day closure that prevented thousands of Palestinians from traveling.

Thousands have been waiting to enter Egypt via the Rafah crossing for school or to go to the hospital. Hundreds more Palestinians are reportedly waiting to get back home to Gaza.

It is not clear how long Egyptian authorities will keep the crossing open.

Hamas leaders in Gaza have a tense relationship with Egypt's army-backed leadership. Egyptian officials have accused Hamas of aiding militants in the Sinai and blame security concerns for delays at the Rafah crossing.

The reopening comes a day after thousands of Muslim Brotherhood supporters took to the streets in scattered protests across Egypt to call for an end to the military-backed government and the reinstatement of Mr. Morsi.

The protests did not show the strength in numbers or intensity of previous demonstrations, some of which boasted tens of thousands of protesters

Rule of Law in Taiwan should be the Principle .

Tainan mayor fails to confront interior minister

Dapu protesters could face criminal charges

 
A  Kye  element  of  the  Rule   of   Law  is   the   principle  that  disputes   should  be  appear  to  be   decided   according    to   the  Law  and   nothing  but  the   Law  .

Journalists will be threatened , if have concern with Snowden . .

No 10 'knew of Miranda detention'
The UK government was "kept abreast" of the decision to detain David Miranda, the partner of Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald, a spokesman says.

• May: 'I was briefed' Watch
• Editor: 'Suspicious questioning' Watch
• 'They asked about my whole life' Watch
• What is schedule 7?
   US given 'heads up' on detention

Uploaded videos (playlist)

How does the Taiwan Paliament interpret the ' during peacetime ' ?

Largest inmate transfer marks reform

               ACCORDING   to   the   International    Law   Chinese  Civil  War  is   not  ended  legally  .   To   this  day   no   Armistice   and   Peace   Treaty  has   ever  been   signed   to   end  the   Chinese  Civil   War  .  
              The   Taiwan   Relation  Act  , 1989   of   the   US   and   the   Anti- Secession  Law   ,2005   of   the   PRC  are  clear   evidences   for   Chinese   Civil   War  has   been   continuing  without   ending   which   has  been   the   last  event  of   the   third  Taiwan   Strait   Crisis  in   1995-96   , is  existed  . 


To this day, no armistice or peace treaty has ever been signed, and it is debated as to the whether the Civil War has legally ended.^[10] Cross-Strait relations have been hindered by military threats and political and economic pressure, particularly over Taiwan's political status, with both governments officially adhering to a "One-China policy." The PRC still actively claims Taiwan as part of its territory and continues to threaten the ROC with a military invasion if the ROC officially declares independence by changing its name to and gaining international recognition as the Republic of Taiwan. The ROC mutually claims mainland China, and they both continue the fight over diplomatic recognition. Today, the war as such occurs on the political and economic fronts in the form of cross-Strait relations; however, the two separate de facto states have close economic ties.^[11]