Thai Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra has not been overthrown , but compelled to leave Bangkok ....

Thai protesters to scale back Bangkok gatherings

          The  political  Struggle   between   the   opposition   party   and   the   Thai   Government  should  be   ended  without  foreing-backed   coercing  .
          Gen. Prayuth  Chan-ocha   said  Friday  ( 28.2.2014 )  "  Everything  must  go   step  by   step  .......but  right   now  ,  we   are   playing  the  role  of  providing  security  and   protecting the   overall  stability   of  the  country .
       It  is  enough  is   enough  ,  to   execute   the  Democratic  Process   again  and  Rule  of   Law  .  The  Thai  Army  would  be   thanked   by   the  Thai   People  ! 
       God  bless  with  the  Military  Serve  For   the   people  in   every   country   !
The  U.S.  secretary   of   State   John  Kerry  in   a  statement  ,  calll   for  Thai   Authorities   , to  investigate   the   attacks   and  bring   to  Justic  .
        The  Ukraine  military  should  take   a  lesson  from   Thai   Army   which   is  following  a  political  strategy   stand   by   the  all   Thai   People  . 
        Yes  .  Ukraine  is  not   a  member  of  NATO  or  a   region  ally  of  the   U.S.   but   a   neighbouring  of  Russia  . Think   clearly  ,  do   clearly  ,   Ukraine   ! 

       Peaceful  mean   would  be  found  for  You   !  

Pivot to Asia-Pacific will be failed ! Why ? What ?

The  U.S.  has  failed  to achive  its   goal   in  Afghanistan   and    Iraq  .
The  Western   powers  and   their   regional   allies  , Qatar  ,  Saudi  Arabia  and   Turkey  have   lost   control  aligaed   Militants   (  Foreign-backed  opposition  groups  )   operating   inside  Syria  .
         It   is   likely  the   U.S.  may   support   the   Al-qaeta  , terrorists    who   has    the   same   target   to  fight   Bahar  Al-Assad   stepping  down  .
         In   the   early   2012  ,  Obama  Administratio  announced   that  it   would  be   intensifying  the  U.S.  role  in  the   Asia-Pacific  Regions ,  (  Appears   to   be   East-Asia  ,  Southeast-Asia  ,  Astralia  and  the   Coastal  Area  of  South-Asia .)  To  form  a  nine-nations  Trans-Pacific Strategic  Economic  Partnership  ( TPP )  free  trade   agreement  (FTA  ) . The  nine  nations  TPP are   Australia  ,  Brunei  ,  Chile  ,  Malasia,  New  Zealand  ,  Peru  ,Singapore  ,  the   U.S.   and  Vietnam  . In   addition  ,  Canada  ,  Mexico   and  Japan  may   be  not  clear  .
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Kerry   says, there  is  No  Let   Up  in   U.S.  Asia    Pivot  ..............
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

It has not always been clear what those shared goals are because the goals of the pivot itself are unclear, says American Enterprise Institute analyst Michael Auslin.

"The administration never articulated what the pivot was for, what the rebalance was for.  It's not that it was a bad idea. It was a good idea.  But they never explained it.  They never sold it.  They never told us why it was important," he said.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton first launched the Asia Pivot, but Cato Institute analyst Doug Bandow says it has lost steam under Secretary Kerry.

"The pivot in many ways was Secretary Clinton's initiative. She focused on it. Secretary Kerry, of course, has spent a lot of time in the Middle East, a lot of time promoting negotiations between Palestinians and Israelis, now focused on Syria. So his emphasis never quite seemed to be as much on Asia," he said.

Secretary Kerry says there is no let-up on the Asia Pivot.  And he has repeatedly sought to reassure Beijing it is not meant to check Chinese influence.

But China says the U.S. is interfering in rival territorial claims in the East China Sea and the South China Sea, where Washington says Beijing is displaying an "incremental pattern of assertiveness."

"It is extremely irresponsible for the United States to make groundless accusations against China without checking the facts," said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei.

Washington especially risks being drawn into the dispute over islands between China and Japan, where American University professor Lou Goodman says uncertainty about the Asia Pivot could make things worse.

"There are domestic politics operating in both China and Japan that when this issue gets raised causes responses that are strong," said Goodman.

Auslin says unmet expectations about a bigger presence in Asia could be worse than if Washington did nothing at all.

"We may have bitterly disappointed those who really were hoping for not only an expanded U.S. role but a more innovative U.S. role, a U.S. role that really looked at how you could build up a more liberal and democratic Asia, one that had rules and norms of order," he said.

 

Who will declare the Responsibility of the Proxy War in Syria ?

        People   in   Syria   s hould   give   their   Gride   Line   and   Brave   Manner  for   the   Proxy   War   to   end   without   Intercession   from   the   world   power   and   other   Muslim   Brother   Countries  ,such  as   Saudi   Arabia  ,   Turkey  and   Qatar  .    The   people   of  Syria  should   show   their   Unity   Force  which   is   meant   the   power   of  Syrians  to   build   the   Sovereign    State    themselves    .  The   people   Syria    should   have   Freedom   of  Fear  ,  Freedom  of   Peace   and   Freedom   of   Security  .
     Freedom  of   Syrian  should   be   seen  !

   +++++++++++++++++++++++++

1000s of Syrians voice support for government

Syrians take part in a pro-government demonstration in Syria on February 19, 2014.

Wed Feb 19, 2014 9:33PM GMT

0

Thousands of Syrians have taken to streets near the capital Damascus to express support for the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

The demonstration was held in the town of Sayyidah Zaynab in Damascus countryside on Wednesday, the official SANA news agency reported.
The participants, who were carrying posters of the president, chanted slogans against terrorism and foreign interference in Syria.
Meanwhile, other pro-government demonstrations, including one with thousands of participants in the western province of Hama, were held elsewhere in the country.
Syrian and Lebanese citizens as well as party figures took part in a march held in the city of Qusayr in the west of the country.
Syria has been has gripped by deadly unrest since 2011. Over 130,000 people have reportedly been killed and millions displaced due to the unrest.
According to reports, the Western powers and their regional allies -- Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey -- are supporting the militants operating inside Syria.
NT/MHB/SS

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

People in Syria have held mass rallies to show their support for President Bashar al-Assad and the army.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in the capital Damascus and its countryside on Saturday.
They expressed support for President Assad and the Syrian army forces in their fight against terrorism and foreign-backed militants.
Pro-government demonstrations were also held in the western city of Homs and its countryside.
On February 2, Syrians also took to the streets of Damascus and the town of Nabek in support of the government.
Similar rallies have frequently been staged in the country during the past couple of years.
The pro-government demonstrations came as 83 people, including children and women, were evacuated from Homs as part of a three-day ceasefire brokered by the UN between the Syrian army and the foreign-backed militants.
The deal also allows the entrance of humanitarian assistance for civilians who choose to stay, while the two sides have also agreed on a pause in fighting as the deal is being implemented.
Meanwhile, thousands of Syrians have returned home in the town of Muadamiyat al-Sham, located in Rif Dimashq Province near Damascus, following a ceasefire deal between the two sides of the conflict.
Syria has been gripped by deadly unrest since 2011. Some sources say more than 130,000 people have been killed and millions displaced due to the violence fueled by Western-backed militants.

The Taiwan Relation Act , January 1'st 1979 . The two different edges spear Relation Act .

US supports cross-strait dialogue, vows to meet Taiwan's security needs .......

The   US  Assistant  Secretary  of   State  Deniel  Russel  said  on  WEDNESDAY   ( 5.2.2014  ) :  Washing 's  security   commitment  toward  Taiwan  under   the    Taiwan 
Relation  Act  .

We   are   committed   to   helping  to   meet   Taiwan's  legitimate  security     needs ,....

Taiwan   Relation  Act  . 
+++++++++++++
 

Findings and Declaration of Policy

Section. 2.

1. The President- having terminated governmental relations between the United States and the governing authorities on Taiwan recognized by the United States as the Republic of China prior to January 1, 1979, the Congress finds that the enactment of this Act is necessary--
   1. to help maintain peace, security, and stability in the Western Pacific; and
   2. to promote the foreign policy of the United States by authorizing the continuation of commercial, cultural, and other relations between the people of the United States and the people on Taiwan.
2. It is the policy of the United States--
   1. to preserve and promote extensive, close, and friendly commercial, cultural, and other relations between the people of the United States and the people on Taiwan, as well as the people on the China mainland and all other peoples of the Western Pacific area;
   2. to declare that peace and stability in the area are in the political, security, and economic interests of the United States, and are matters of international concern;
   3. to make clear that the United States decision to establish diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China rests upon the expectation that the future of Taiwan will be determined by peaceful means;
   4. to consider any effort to determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful means, including by boycotts or embargoes, a threat to the peace and security of the Western Pacific area and of grave concern to the United States;
   5. to provide Taiwan with arms of a defensive character; and
   6. to maintain the capacity of the United States to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion that would jeopardize the security, or the social or economic system, of the people on Taiwan.
3. Nothing contained in this Act shall contravene the interest of the United States in human rights, especially with respect to the human rights of all the approximately eighteen million inhabitants of Taiwan. The preservation and enhancement of the human rights of all the people on Taiwan are hereby reaffirmed as objectives of the United States.

Implementation of United States Policy with Regard to Taiwan

Section. 3.

1. In furtherance of the policy set forth in section 2 of this Act, the United States will make available to Taiwan such defense articles and defense services in such quantity as may be necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability.
2. The President and the Congress shall determine the nature and quantity of such defense articles and services based solely upon their judgment of the needs of Taiwan, in accordance with procedures established by law. Such determination of Taiwan's defense needs shall include review by United States military authorities in connection with recommendations to the President and the Congress.
3. The President is directed to inform the Congress promptly of any threat to the security or the social or economic system of the people on Taiwan and any danger to the interests of the United States arising therefrom. The President and the Congress shall determine, in accordance with constitutional processes, appropriate action by the United States in response to any such danger.

King designated new national security head

The key disputes or issues would be resolved in Syria talks .

 Both   sides   should   deduct  their   single  or   narrow   minded   stand  for   another  round   of   Talks   . The   proxy  war   should   be   ended  .   Conduct   of    hostilities   in   Syria   should   be      inquired   by   the   UN ,  ACCORDING    to    the   International    Humanitarian   Law  . 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Al Pessin

January 31, 2014

LONDON — U.N. mediator Lakhdar Brahimi wrapped up the first round of Syria peace talks in Geneva Friday reporting little progress on key issues of how to end the fighting and get much-needed humanitarian aid to besieged areas.

Brahimi told reporters the next round is set to begin on February 10, pending agreement from the Syrian government. Still, the government has not confirmed that it will attend.

Brahimi was frank during his press conference, saying "The gaps between the sides remain wide; there is no use pretending otherwise."

Lakhdar Brahimi's points of agreement between Syria's warring parties:

-Discussing the implementation of the Geneva Communique

-Establishing at transitional governing body

-The urgent need to bring violence to an end

-The future of Syria must be determined by the Syrian people

-No loss of Syrian territory will be accepted

-The Syrian people want a genuinely democratic Syria

-The humanitarian situation musts be addressed rapidly

-Violent extremism and terrorism must be rejected

​But he added he observed a "little bit of common ground."

Brahimi presented 10 points he believes the two sides agree on. But he acknowledged the list did not amount to much, mainly consisting of general statements about the need to negotiate a solution, ease the suffering of the Syrian people and build a country with respect for democracy and human rights.

"Progress is very slow indeed, but the sides have engaged in an acceptable manner," he said. "This is a very modest beginning, but it is a beginning on which we can build.”

The two sides could not reach agreement on humanitarian issues.

But Brahimi said that during eight days of “difficult” meetings, the government and opposition delegations got used to sitting in the same room, something it was initially not clear whether they would do at all.

“They have presented positions, and listened to one another," he said. "There have been moments when one side has even acknowledged the concerns and the difficulties and the point of view of the other side.”

BILATERAL SECURITY AGREEMENT , Leave or Stay !

Karzai's   Stand    is   farm !   It  is  Sovereignty    Power  . Please !  Accept   it   ,  Uncle  Sam  !
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Ayaz Gul

January 25, 2014

ISLAMABAD —

President Hamid Karzai says if the United States wants to leave Afghanistan it “can do it even today, may God be with them”, but he will not back down from his conditions to sign a key security pact with Washington that would allow American forces to stay in the country beyond 2014.  

 

The NATO-led combat military mission is ending in December and Washington needs the so-called bilateral security agreement (BSA) to be in place as soon as possible so a smaller American military presence in Afghanistan can continue counter-terrorism activities as well as advise and assist Afghan security forces. 

 

A traditional national assembly of Afghan elders and politicians also endorsed the security pact late last year. But President Hamid Karzai has since refused to sign the deal until the U.S. military ends raids against Afghan homes while chasing insurgents and helps Kabul in opening peace talks with the Taliban. 

 

Speaking to reporters in Kabul Saturday, the Afghan leader reiterated his demands.  “Until we are satisfied, he said, that the BSA will bringing positive results, signing the document will mean bringing repression to the country, its soil and the people,” he stated.

 

President Karzai said that "Afghanistan will never be ready to sign anything under pressure," adding that “no pressure, no threats and no psychological war against our people will force them to sign the BSA”. 

 

President Karzai also denounced the use of advertising, some paid for by the United States, advocating the BSA be signed. 

 

The United States has warned that it will be forced to end its military mission and cut financial assistance to Afghanistan without the BSA in place. President Karzai in his news conference again dismissed those warnings. 

 

The Afghan leader says that “if they (U.S. forces) are leaving, then Allah Hafiz to them [May God Be with them] and they can leave even today”. As far as Afghans are concerned, he added, they will survive. 

 

President Karzai openly questioned motives for the U.S. counter-terrorism mission in Afghanistan. 

 

He said that if the United States wants to ally with Afghanistan, "they must explain their [anti-terrorism] policy and tell us who are they chasing, what do they want, and what is their target?” 

 

President Karzai added that U.S. officials have told him there are only up to 40 al-Qaida operatives left in Afghanistan that they want to eliminate. So, only for such a small number they have caused so much unrest, the Afghan leader asked. He claimed the Afghan forces can easily deal with them and capture them. 

 

He went on to harshly criticize a detention facility on the U.S.-run Bagram air field north of Kabul, condemning it as a “Taliban-producing factory” where he alleged that Afghans are tortured into hating their country.  

 

Karzai’s critical remarks came as President Barack Obama is preparing to make his State of the Union address on Tuesday. During a recent trip to Kabul, a group of key American senators had warned that in the absence of any progress on the BSA, the U.S. president will not be able to allocate future funds and forces for the Afghan mission. 

           it   is   enough ,   God   bless  with  you   !

Afghan President Hamid Karzai says he will not sign a bilateral security deal with the United States if Washington does not guarantee peace in Afghanistan.

Karzai’s remarks came during a press conference in the capital, Kabul, on Saturday.
He said the signing of the deal would have no positive conclusion if peace and security were not guaranteed.

"If US is not willing to accept our conditions on the BSA (so-called Bilateral Security Agreement) they can leave anytime and Afghan will go without foreigners," he said.

Karzai also blamed the United States for pursuing wrong policies in the so-called fight against terrorism.
The Afghan president said it would not be tolerable for Afghans if innocent people were killed even after the security agreement is signed.
In addition, the Afghan president warned that pressures and psychological wars would not prompt him to sign the deal.
Karzai had previously accused the United States of not providing the country with military supplies in an attempt to pressure him to sign the controversial deal.
Elsewhere in his press conference, Karzai condemned the US military detentions in the war-torn country, describing the notorious prison at the Bagram Airbase in eastern Afghanistan as a Taliban-making factory.
The Afghan president said inmates at Bagram have been insulted and tortured by American forces.
NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen has urged the Afghan government to sign the BSA with the US as a matter of urgency.
The deal allows the US to keep thousands of its troops in Afghanistan beyond the 2014 withdrawal date.
Afghan activists say the security treaty between Washington and Kabul will pave the way for a prolonged US military presence in the war-ravaged country.
Afghan political figures have also heaped scorn on US-led forces for committing unforgivable crimes against Afghan women and children since invading the country in 2001.
CAH/HSN/HMV
                                                                            

No chance for fair trial in US: Snowden

No chance for fair trial in US: Snowden

The  U.S.   should    reform  or  chang   its   intelligent   formation     and      rewrite   the   espionage   act  .  Particulaly   when   we   now   have   courts  reform  the   Federal    Governments   from   congress  making   it   clear  there   Programs   haven't   make   us   safe  .............,   Snowden   note  .
             Yes,  that  is   enough   ! 

God   bless  with   you   ! 

India -US Dispute Escalate as Diplomat Hades Home .

 It   is   the   most  impotance   of   the   struggle  between   the   East  and  wast  custom   value   result   for   the   US   and   The  India  .
     Uncle   Sam   forgets   the  Customary  enforcement  of   a   State  .  
   

India's Foreign Minister Salman Khurshid has sought to downplay the row with Washington over an Indian diplomat who was arrested in the US.

There was "no stand-off" with the US, he told reporters in Delhi, and predicted problems would be sorted out.
The row erupted after the diplomat, Devyani Khobragade, was arrested in New York on charges of visa fraud and underpaying her housekeeper.
She is now back in India after an apparent agreement with Washington.
"If there are any issues" India and the US will "sort them out mutually", Mr Khurshid said in televised remarks.
He was speaking a day after Ms Khobragade arrived in India, where she was greeted by her father, Uttam. On Saturday, the two were welcomed by Mr Khurshid.

Continue reading the main story

Analysis

Jonathan Marcus BBC diplomatic correspondent

---

In requiring the US to remove one of its diplomats from Delhi, the Indian government is effectively treating the departure of its own diplomat from the US as an expulsion.
The question now is whether this draws a line under the messy diplomatic spat between the two countries.
Of greater importance is the longer-term impact this may have on bilateral ties. India, a democracy and rising power in Asia, is seen in many quarters in Washington as a natural fit to become a special partner of the United States. The US has sought a closer strategic and military partnership with Delhi but to a large extent has been rebuffed.
India is cautious about advancing ties too quickly. It doesn't want to antagonise Beijing, and many Indians still see the US as having been far too close to Pakistan.

Surrounded by reporters on leaving the Maharashtra Sadan state guesthouse, Ms Khobragade gave little away.

"No comments, I am really thankful for all your support... I cannot make any comments right now. My government will speak for me, my lawyer will speak for me," she said.
Ms Khobragade was asked to leave the US as the diplomatic rift deepened.
The US meanwhile confirmed that an American official will leave its embassy in Delhi at India's request - Mr Khurshid described this as an expulsion.
"We have our reasons and have informed the US about it. We are in touch with the US. We will do what needs to be done. I do not think that this needs more discussion," Mr Khurshid said.
Washington said it deeply regretted the move but hoped that it would bring closure to the case and lead to a return to constructive ties.
The expelled US diplomat has not been named.
Sources told Agence France Presse that the individual was of similar rank to Ms Khobragade and had been involved in the Khobragade case.
'Shocked and appalled'

 Ms Khobragade and her father (l) met the Indian foreign minister the day after her arrival in Delhi

India had demanded an apology after Ms Khobragade, 39, was handcuffed and strip-searched following her arrest last month. It refused to waive her immunity so she could be prosecuted in the US.
Ms Khobragade has always denied any wrongdoing.
On Thursday she was indicted by a US federal grand jury in Manhattan, but was also granted immunity by US officials, paving the way for her to return to India.
Ms Khobragade was arrested after a complaint from her maid, Sangeeta Richard.
She in turn accused Ms Richard of theft and attempted blackmail.
Delhi said it was "shocked and appalled" at the manner of her arrest, and ordered a series of diplomatic reprisals against the US.
Security barricades around the US embassy in the capital were removed and a visiting US delegation was snubbed by senior Indian politicians and officials.
On Wednesday, the embassy was ordered to stop "commercial activities on its premises". India also said that embassy cars could be penalised for traffic offences.
The embassy has been told to shut down a club within its premises which includes a pool, restaurant and tennis court, NDTV news channel said.

Amnesty to U.S. : Respect People's Human Rights .

It  is   from  Press   TV :

Amnesty International has said it is “deeply concerned” over US spying activities and has urged US President Barack Obama to consider “human rights” when introducing reforms to Washington’s spying programs.

In an open letter on January 9, Amnesty International said Obama has to “put human rights at the center of U.S. policy” in order to ensure real reform. The letter urged Obama to take the following steps:

Disclose the scope of U.S. surveillance to ensure comprehensive reform;
Respect the rights of all people, not only U.S. citizens;
Recognize the application of international human rights standards to U.S. practice;
Take into account the International Principles on the Application of Human Rights to Communications Surveillance, which provide guidance in implementing these international standards;
Establish an independent privacy rights champion before the FISA Court;
Support encryption standards to increase security and trust;
Respect the rights of whistleblowers such as Edward Snowden.

On Wednesday, Obama met with the leaders of US spy agencies at the White House to discuss a number of changes to the National Security Agency’s spying programs.
White House officials have said Obama is to make an announcement about the reforms before his State of the Union address on January 28.
Steven W. Hawkins, Executive Director of Amnesty International USA, said American whistleblower Edward Snowden’s human rights should also be respected if Obama intends to ensure “real reform.”
“Snowden should not be prosecuted for revelations about human rights violations by the U.S. government,” Hawkins said.
Snowden, whose leaks have brought to light the scope and scale of the US government’s spying activities across the globe, faces espionage charges in the US and even some former US officials have suggested that he should be “hanged” if convicted of treason.
ISH/ISH

Is Japan Prime Minister Shinzo Abe either a Nationalist or Imperialist ? ............

Japan's pacifist constitution may be revised: Abe
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

In   the   end  of   2011  and   early   2012  ,  the  Obama  Admistration  announced   that  it   would  be   intensifying  the  US  ROLE    in   the   Asia-Pacific   region  , which  will   include  the   East  Asia  ,  South-East  Asia  ,      Australia   and   Costal  Area  of  South   Asia   .

As   Part   of  its   Proclaimed  "  Strategic  Turn "  : 
      _ New  troop  deployments  to   Australia  ,
      _  New  Naval  deployments  to   Singapore  ,  and   Military   cooperation  with    the   Philippines  .  
      _  A   nine   nations  Tran-Pacific  Strategic   Economic    Partnership    (  TPP ). 
The   nine   nations   are   Australia  , Brunei  ,  Chile  ,  Malasia  ,  Newzealand  ,Peru  ,
Singapore  ,  the   United  States  and   Vietnam  .

      _  Canada  ,  Mexico   and   Japan  have   publicly   announced   their   interest   joining  the   TPP   talks  .

 Would     The   purpose   of  the   pivot   or   rebalancing   toward   the   Asia-Pacific region    be   depended  on   the   support    of   Abe's   Policy   ?


The   Nationalism  and   Imperialism   .
+++++++++++++++++++++++++

     
Nationalism is the opposite of imperialism. Imperialism tries to make big nations that have many ethnic groups. In imperialist states, some groups are usually more powerful and are seen as better than others. Nationalists think that such hierarchy is bad. They say that in nations with one ethnic group, everyone has the same value and power. Sometimes nationalism is used to support imperialism, but that is against the original idea of nationalism. Such using of political ideas against their original purpose is quite usual in politics and happens with many other ideas too.
Nationalism had important role in ending the colonial rule. Nationalism spread to colonies and made their people to desire independence. Nationalism also made the people in metropolitan states (countries that colonized others) to accept more the desire of other people to rule themselves. However nationalists think that the end of colonialization of Africa was not done well. They think that there would not be so many conflicts in Africa if African nations had built in a nationalist way (so that every ethnic group is its own nation). After the imperialists left their African colonies, the new nations were built with borders that were not the same as the ethnic borders. New nations became nations with many ethnic groups, which do not want to or cannot live peacefully in the same society with the others.