Syria and Russia relation effect .

                            The  Relation  between   Syria   and   Russia  would   determind  not  only   the  future   of   middle   east   but   also   the    U.N.  SECURITY  COUNCIL    status  .   How   would   you  think  ?  
                    Double standards?
Russia employs the same argument for the helicopter gunships it is trying to send back to Syria.
These are Soviet-era attack helicopters which the Russians have been refurbishing. Last week, the Russian cargo ship which was transporting them had its insurance withdrawn in British waters and the vessel was forced to turn back, but Moscow says it is determined to complete the delivery.
The West accuses Russia of shoring up President Assad with weapons shipments. Russia accused the West of double standards.
"Why is the US determined to sell weapons to Bahrain after the Bahraini authorities, with help from the Saudis, suppressed the Arab Spring in Bahrain?" asks defence analyst Ruslan Pukhov, head of the arms trade think tank CAST.

Continue reading the main story

Syria's Russian-made military

• Nearly 5,000 tanks; 2,500 infantry fighting vehicles; 2,500 self-propelled or towed artillery units

The vast majority of Syria's equipment was supplied by the Soviet Union and then Russia. Many of the tanks are the T55 design, which is more than 50 years old

• 325 Tactical aircraft; 143 helicopters

Russia still services some Syrian aircraft. It is hoping to return a shipment of refurbished Syrian Hind helicopters, of the sort used in Syria's crackdown on rebels, despite Western protests

• Nearly 2,000 air defence pieces

Syria has bought modern Russian air defence systems in recent years to try to stave off attack from Israel

• 295,000 active personnel; 314,000 reserve personnel

The Syrian crackdown has largely involved ground forces supported by tanks and armoured vehicles, artillery, mortars, helicopters and drones. But there are doubts about the reliability of many army units. The most difficult operations are being entrusted to elite units with close ties to the regime
Statistics: IISS Analysis: Jonathan Marcus

"Russia doesn't see any problems selling weapons to Syria if the CIA and French and British secret services are shipping military hardware via Turkey to the rebels."

Syria conflict as power planning of in middle east .

                  Syria   Crusis   is   become  a  power  struggle   of   the   U.N.  SECURITY   COUNCIL   .   It   is   too   early  to   predict  the  future   of   Syria  leader  .  
              
Proxy wars
The spillover into Lebanon, for example, is no longer a theoretical possibility.

Syria's war is already having an impact on its neighbours, with refugee camps along borders

More than 20 people were killed in violent clashes earlier this year between the Alawite minority - the same sect as President Assad in Syria - and the Sunni majority in the northern Lebanese city of Tripoli.
Indeed, no other country in the region is likely to feel the impact of the events in Syria more than Lebanon.
The war in Syria has aggravated an already polarised Lebanon between supporters of the Syrian rebels and friends of the Assad regime.
Among the regime's supporters are the Shia Hezbollah group and its powerful militia, whose emergence and survival has, for many decades, depended on vital ties with Damascus and its allies further afield in Iran.
The demise of the Assad regime in Syria does not bode well for either of them, and no-one can predict, with any degree of certainty, how they will respond.
Optimists believe that Hezbollah will not plunge the country into civil war and will resign to reconfiguring itself as a domestic player defending Shia interests inside Lebanon instead of trying to flex its regional muscles.
Traditional sectarian and ethnic loyalties aside, no other political order in the region has tied its fate and future to a network of non-state actors like the Assad regime. These include the fundamentalist Shia Hezbollah group in Lebanon, Palestinian militants in Gaza and the West Bank, Turkish Kurdish separatists and Sunni jihadists in Iraq.
For decades, it has relied on such allies to wage proxy wars in the geopolitical struggle for survival and supremacy.
Iraq is another case in point. Some analysts have noted a possible link between events in Syria and the sudden spike in violence in Iraq.
Although it is possible that Sunni militants in Iraq may have simply felt encouraged to challenge the Shia-dominated government in Baghdad, it is not beyond the realms of possibility that Damascus is, once again, pulling some strings

Chinese Space Mission returned to earth. ( from Aljazeera )

               Some  western  news  medias   had  blocked  or   covered  that   news   for  international   community   to   know   on   line   media  !   I   don't  know   why   or   what  the   matter  !    God  bless  with   you  !   ..........             
Three astronauts have returned to Earth after achieving China's first manual docking in orbit, a milestone in the country's effort to build a space station by the end of the decade.
The return of the trio, including the country's first female astronaut, to a landing zone in a remote and sandy area of northern China was broadcast to a national audience on state television CCTV on Friday.
The return capsule of the Shenzhou-9 spacecraft, which lifted off on June 16, hit the ground at about 10:00am local time (02:00 GMT), after an approach slowed by a large parachute.
Rescue workers quickly surrounded and opened the capsule, which had turned on its side and looked charred on the outside.
All three astronauts were in good physical condition, the state run Xinhua news agency reported.
They would need to remain in the capsule for about 50 minutes to acclimatise, according to CCTV, which showed a medical worker in a white uniform going inside to talk with them.
The crew had successfully carried out China's first manual space docking with the orbiting Tiangong-1 module, a difficult move that is essential in the process of building a space station. Beijing aims to have built such a station by 2020.
The manoeuvre - completed by the Americans and Russians in the 1960s - requires two vessels orbiting Earth at thousands of kilometres per hour to come together very gently to avoid destroying each other.
It was the main goal of the mission, which was China's fourth manned trip to space.
The Shenzhou-9 team was headed by Jing Haipeng, a veteran astronaut on his third space mission.
Liu Wang carried out the manual docking and the third crew member was Liu Yang, the first woman China has sent into space. Yang has been hailed as a national heroine.

Too Selfish Interest.

                       It  is   too   selfish  interest   in   European  Union  ,   according  to   Kissinger's  opinion .   At   present  Euro-debts  crisis  is   the   effect  from   Euro-bank   monetary   system  ,   the  political   structure  struggling  and  holds   the   sovereign-power  to   control   others   .  
The former U.S. secretary of state, who worked in the administrations of Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford at the height of the Cold War, on Wednesday denied ownership of a phrase often attributed to him—"Who do I call if I want to speak to Europe?"—and said it may have actually been coined by a European politician.
The phrase has been ascribed to Mr. Kissinger to illustrate his alleged irritation with Europe's multitude of independent states, which didn't coordinate policy very well in the 1970s.

Enlarge Image

Close

Agence France-Presse/Getty Images

Kissinger in Warsaw on Thursday.

"I'm not sure I actually said it, but it's a good phrase," Mr. Kissinger said during a panel discussion with the Polish foreign minister, Radoslaw Sikorski.
Despite decades of integration that produced a common currency, the euro and the passport-free zone for travelers, the European Union lacks a strategic concept that would allow it to become a superpower and doesn't have a clear representative for other countries' leaders to contact, Mr. Kissinger said.
"It isn't really absolutely clear when America wants to deal with Europe who exactly the authorized voice of Europe would be," Mr. Kissinger said. "Most importantly, on many issues, there doesn't really exist a unified European strategic approach."
The EU, roiled by a debt crisis that threatens to undermine the euro currency, has since 2009 had a permanent president of the European Council, the name for formal meetings of heads of EU states. German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who heads the government of the EU's largest economy, is seen as the most powerful figure within the bloc despite holding no formal role in the EU's bureacracy. It also has a top diplomat, Catherine Ashton—whom Mr. Kissinger and his Polish host, Mr. Sikorski, mentioned as one of the possible contacts in Europe.
But each of the EU's 27 member states continues to run its own foreign policy, while the council president merely coordinates summits of the states' leaders.
Mr. Kissinger acknowledged that it is easier now than several decades ago "to get answers to technical questions" from Europe's institutions.
But he said the Continent lacks an internal structure—and a joint military force—that would allow it to take a bigger role in world affairs.
Write to Marcin Sobczyk at marcin.sobczyk@dowjones.com

A.S.E.A.N. UNITY .

The   main  Principles  of    A.S.E.A.N.     : 
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES

In their relations with one another, the ASEAN Member States have adopted the following fundamental principles, as contained in the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia (TAC) of 1976:

1. Mutual respect for the independence, sovereignty, equality, territorial integrity, and national identity of all nations;
2. The right of every State to lead its national existence free from external interference, subversion or coercion;
3. Non-interference in the internal affairs of one another;
4. Settlement of differences or disputes by peaceful manner;
5. Renunciation of the threat or use of force; and
6. Effective cooperation among themselves.

A good work , A good idea and Dr. Sinthiyamg .

                 Your   work   is   outstanding  !    God   bless   with   you    ! 

ဇြန္လ ၂၆ရက္၊ ၂၀၁၂ခုႏွစ္။ ေစာခါးစူးညား (ေကအိုင္စီ)

ထိုင္း-ျမန္မာနယ္စပ္အေျခစိုက္ မယ္ေတာ္ေဆးခန္းတည္ေထာင္သူ ေဒါက္တာ စင္သီယာေမာင္ႏွင့္ ျမန္မာအစိုးရ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးကိုယ္စားလွယ္ မီးရထား၀န္ႀကီး ဦးေအာင္မင္းတို႔က ထိုင္းႏိုင္ငံ မဲေဆာက္ၿမိဳ႕၊Wattana Village Resort ဟိုတယ္တြင္ ယေန႔ ေန႔လည္ ၁၂နာရီ၌ ေတြ႔ဆံုခဲ့သည္။
နာရီ၀က္ၾကာ ေတြ႔ဆံုခဲ့သည့္ အဆိုပါ ေတြ႔ဆံုပြဲတြင္ နယ္စပ္ေဒသရွိ က်န္းမာေရး၊ ပညာေရးႏွင့္ လူမႈေရးကိစၥ မ်ားကို ေရွ႕ဆက္ ဘယ္လိုလုပ္ေဆာင္သင့္သည္မ်ားကို အစိုးရ ကိုယ္စားလွယ္ဘက္မွ ဦးေအာင္မင္းႏွင့္ လူ၀င္မႈ ႀကီးၾကပ္ေရး၀န္ႀကီး ဦးခင္ရီ ဦးေဆာင္ေဆြးေႏြးခဲ့ၿပီး ေဒါက္တာစင္သီယာေမာင္ဘက္မွ ဆရာမ ေနာ္ထူး၊ ဆရာ ေစာခ်စ္၀င္းႏွင့္ CDC ေက်ာင္းအုပ္ မန္းေရႊႏွင္းတို႔က ပါ၀င္ေဆြးေႏြးခဲ့သည္။
ေဒါက္တာစင္သီယာေမာင္က “ဦးေအာင္မင္းကို နယ္စပ္မွာရွိတဲ့ က်န္းမာေရး၊ ပညာေရးနဲ႔ ကေလးအခြင့္အေရးအဖြဲ႔အစည္းေတြရဲ႕ လက္ရွိလုပ္ငန္းေတြကို က်မတို႔ တင္ျပတယ္။ လာမယ့္အေျခအေနမွာ ထိုင္းႏိုင္ငံထဲမွာရွိတဲ့ က်န္းမာေရး၊ ပညာေရးနဲ႔ လူမႈေရးအေျခခံအဖြဲ႔ေတြနဲ႔ ျပည္တြင္းထဲမွာ ရွိတဲ့အဖြဲ႔ေတြ ပူးေပါင္းေဆာင္ရြက္မႈေတြ ပိုလုပ္ႏိုင္ေအာင္ ဆက္ၿပီး ေဆြးေႏြးသြားမယ္။”ဟု သတင္းထာက္မ်ားကို ေျပာသြားခဲ့သည္။

ေတြ႔ဆံုမႈေၾကာင့္ ဦးေအာင္မင္းအေနျဖင့္ လက္ရွိ ထိုင္း-ျမန္မာနယ္စပ္ေဒသရွိ က်န္းမာေရး၊ ပညာေရးႏွင့္ လူထုအေျချပဳအဖြဲ႔အစည္းမ်ား၏ လုပ္ငန္းမ်ားကို ပိုမို သေဘာေပါက္သြားၿပီျဖစ္သလို ပူးေပါင္းေဆာင္ရြက္မႈမ်ား ဆက္လက္လုပ္ေဆာင္ရန္ အစိုးရ ကိုယ္စားလွယ္ေတြ ထပ္လႊတ္ေပးမည္ဟု ေျပာသြားေၾကာင္း ေဒါက္တာစင္သီယာေမာင္က ဆိုသည္။
မီးရထား၀န္ႀကီး ဦးေအာင္မင္းက “ဆရာမႀကီး(ေဒါက္တာစင္သီယာေမာင္)လိုအပ္တဲ့ အကူအညီေတြကို ကူညီမယ္။ သမၼတႀကီးကလည္း ကူညီဖို႔ လႊတ္လိုက္တာပဲေလ။ ၿပီးေတာ့ ဆရာမႀကီးကို ကူညီႏိုင္ဖို႔ လူမႈေရးနဲ႔ က်န္းမာေရးအလုပ္ကို လုပ္ေနတဲ့ က်ေနာ့္ဇနီးနဲ႔ ဦးခင္ရီဇနီးလႊတ္ေပးဖို႔ ရွိတယ္။ ဆရာႀကီးရဲ႕ ေဆးခန္းကိုလည္း တရား၀င္ျဖစ္ေအာင္ ႀကိဳးပမ္းေပးမယ္။”ဟု ေျပာသည္။
ထို႔အျပင္ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံမွ တိုင္းရင္းသားမ်ားအတြက္ ထိုင္း-ျမန္မာ နယ္စပ္ မဲေဆာက္ေဒသတြင္ ႀကီးမားခက္ခဲသည့္ အလုပ္မ်ားကို လုပ္ေဆာင္ေနသည့္ ေဒါက္တာစင္သီယာေမာင္အား ေက်းဇူးတင္ေၾကာင္းႏွင့္ လိုအပ္သည့္ အကူအညီမ်ားကို စာျဖင့္ ေရးကာ သမၼတ ဦးသိန္းစိန္ထံသို႔ ယူသြားေပးမည္ျဖစ္ေၾကာင္း ဦးေအာင္မင္းက ေျပာသည္။
လာမည့္ ဇြန္လ ၂၇ရက္ေန႔ နံနက္ ၆နာရီခြဲတြင္ ဦးေအာင္မင္းဦးေဆာင္သည့္ အစိုးရၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရး ကိုယ္စားလွယ္အဖြဲ႔သည္ မဲေဆာက္ရွိ မယ္ေတာ္ေဆးခန္းတြင္ ေဒါက္တာစင္သီယာေမာင္အား ထပ္မံ၍ သြားေရာက္ေတြ႕ဆံုဦးမည္ဟုသိရသည္။
ယေန႔ အစိုးရၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးကိုယ္စားလွယ္ ဦးေအာင္မင္းႏွင့္အဖြဲ႕သည္ မဲေဆာက္ၿမိဳ႕ Wattana Village Resort ဟိုတယ္တြင္ ကရင္အမ်ဳိးသားအစည္းအ႐ံုး-KNU၊ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံလံုးဆိုင္ရာ ေက်ာင္းသားမ်ား ဒီမိုကရက္တစ္တပ္ဦး (ABSDF)တို႔ႏွင့္လည္း ေတြ႔ဆံုေဆြးေႏြးခဲ့သည္။

The I.C.C. says, Muammar Gaddaffi killing may be War Crime .

                           It   was   the   consequence  of   N.A.T.O.   air   strikes   to   protect   civilians  which  supported  rebellion  into   the  civil   war   . 
Col Gaddafi was killed on 20 October after being caught by rebels in his home town of Sirte.
NTC officials initially said he died in crossfire, but promised to investigate following Western pressure.
"I think the way in which Mr Gaddafi was killed creates suspicions of... war crimes," Mr Moreno-Ocampo told reporters.
"I think that's a very important issue. We are raising this concern to the national authorities and they are preparing a plan to have a comprehensive strategy to investigate all these crimes."
Rebel fighters found Col Gaddafi hiding in a concrete drainage pipe after a long and bloody siege of the former leader's home city of Sirte.

Continue reading the main story

Uprising timeline

• Feb 2011: Arrest of human rights campaigner sparks violent protests in eastern city of Benghazi that rapidly spread to other cities.
• March 2011: UN Security Council authorises a no-fly zone over Libya and air strikes to protect civilians, over which Nato assumes command
• May 2011: International Criminal Court seeks arrest of Gaddafi for crimes against humanity
• Aug 2011: Rebels swarm into Col Gaddafi's fortress compound in Tripoli and he goes into hiding
• Oct 2011: Col Gaddafi is killed and three days later rebels declare Libya officially "liberated

• Muammar Gaddafi: How he died
• 'I spoke to Gaddafi before he died'
• 'He died an angry and disappointed man'

He had gone into hiding in August, six months after the Libyan uprising began and five months after Nato intervened in the conflict.

Amateur videos taken at the time of his capture showed him injured but alive, surrounded by a frenzied crowd of jubilant rebel fighters.
He is hustled through the crowd and beaten to the ground on several occasions, before he disappears in the crush and the crackle of gunfire is heard.
His son Mutassim, captured alive with him, also died in the custody of rebel fighters.
The National Transitional Council initially said that Col Gaddafi had been killed in crossfire, but under pressure from Western allies it later promised to investigate how he and his son were killed.
The ICC has indicted another of Col Gaddafi's sons, Saif al-Islam, for alleged war crimes and he is in the custody of the Libyan authorities.
Mr Moreno-Ocampo has accepted that Saif al-Islam will be tried in Libya, not The Hague

The Execution order in the U.S. !

                   The   president  Barack  Obama   used  this   power   for   only  his   presidential   campaign  which   shuld   effect   the  next  generation  of   immigrants   .

Gale Encyclopedia of US History:

Executive Orders

Top

Originally, executive orders based their legitimacy on Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution, which contains the phrase "he [the President of the United States] shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." This phrase was interpreted as a management tool, a way for the president to enforce Congress's wishes. Almost immediately, presidents tried to widen the scope of the short phrase. For instance, George Washington proclaimed a "neutrality order" that declared that Americans must not be involved in disputes between foreign countries; this was not the execution of a law but the creation of a law.

Even though they chafed under the constitutional restriction in Article II, presidents found ways to abide by its spirit until the presidency of Andrew Jackson (1829–1837). Perhaps the most controversial of Jackson's actions was to order the forcible removal of the Cherokees from their homes in Georgia and North Carolina to the Oklahoma Territory.

At the outbreak of the U.S. Civil War in 1861, Congress granted President Abraham Lincoln wide latitude in running the government. Although Lincoln overstepped constitutional boundaries, by and large Lincoln's executive orders were upheld in federal courts because of the national crisis. It was Lincoln who began numbering executive orders, with number 1 being signed on 20 October 1862.

In the 1880s another form of executive order was created, in addition to the constitutional one: in civil service legislation, Congress said that it was up to the president to fill in the details of implementing the legislation. Thus, an executive order could depend on the president's interpretation of the legislation, and it would have the force of law. President Franklin D. Roosevelt was also allowed great latitude with executive orders during the Great Depression and World War II. By FDR's time a president could seize property and control communication. FDR used these powers to order the internment of Japanese subjects and Japanese Americans who lived in the Pacific states.

By President Richard Nixon's era (1969–1974), Congress had left enough holes in legislation for presidents to make executive orders in peacetime that had farreaching effects on America. Nixon used executive orders to implement affirmative action, including declaring ethnic quotas on hiring and in the awarding of government contracts.

President Bill Clinton used executive orders to circumvent a hostile Congress on issues such as environmental laws. His most controversial order, with incalculable consequences, was probably Executive Order 13083 on 14 May 1998 "establishing the principles and foundations of federalism," which grants the federal government powers forbidden by the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution. Executive orders become laws when published in the Federal Register, as this one was on 18 May 1998.

Read more: http://www.answers.com/topic/executive-order-1#ixzz1yCMoSFnI    

 

 

The Syria conflict or violence .

                     The   U.S.   and   the   Russia   have   a  limited  confrontation  in    Syria    .  I   did  not   understand   why   U.S   opposed  Annan's  inclusion  of   Iran  if   there  is   a   meeting  on  June  30   in   Geneva   .  It   has   a   relation   with  the   regional  issue   of   Middle -East .  The   violence   in   Syria  is  not   like   a   civil  war  but   sliding   into  a   Proxy  war  as   a  certain  states  support   the  regime   or   the   opposition  .  

Syrian officials have rejected the characterization of the conflict as a civil war, saying government forces are fighting armed terrorists.

Anti-Assad activists have reported the extensive use of Russian-made helicopter gunships in the siege of Al Heffa and attacks in the nearby port of Latakia, a relatively new tactic in Mr. Assad’s campaign to crush the uprising and a possible reflection of rebel success in damaging his army’s fleet of Russian tanks.

Russia has insisted that it takes no side in the conflict.

Diplomacy aimed at halting the Syrian conflict has faltered despite the rising levels of violence. Mr. Annan, the special envoy whose peace plan placing the monitors in Syria is widely considered near failure, has sought to convene a meeting of influential countries to press all sides in the conflict to honor a cease-fire.

Reuters, quoting unidentified diplomats, reported on Thursday that such a meeting might be held on June 30 in Geneva. The United States has said publicly that it opposes Mr. Annan’s inclusion of Iran if there is a meeting.

In Paris, the French foreign minister, Laurent Fabius, told the France Inter radio station on Friday that “Russians are not today attached to the person of Bashar al-Assad. They clearly see he is a tyrant and a murderer. But they are sensitive about who might take his place, if Assad is ousted. The discussion is about that.”

• 1
• 2

Next Page

To legalize the same-sex marriage in U.K.

   The   same-sex   marriage  has   become  a   Civilization issue   in   some   western  countries   .   In   other   word  ,   it   is   like   a   war   in   Christianity   Countries  .     I   think    ,   this    issue   should   not   be   decided   in   any   society  according  to   the   law  .  Don't  tell  or   say    and  ask   this   question   for  which  will   be  the   best   of   all.      God  bless   with   you   !   

The proposal to legalize same-sex marriage threatens not only to provoke a clash with Christian and Muslim leaders, but also to divide Mr. Cameron’s Conservative Party, adding to political woes that have been building over policy reversals and accusations by his critics that the Conservatives are too close to the rich and powerful.

It could also deepen strains within the coalition, since Mr. Cameron has said Conservative lawmakers may vote on the proposal according to their consciences, while the Liberal Democrat leader, Nick Clegg, wants all of his party’s legislators in Parliament to approve the proposal.

In its statement on Tuesday, the Church of England said, “Marriage benefits society in many ways, not only by promoting mutuality and fidelity, but also by acknowledging an underlying biological complementarity which includes, for many, the possibility of procreation.

“The law should not seek to define away the underlying, objective distinctiveness of men and women,” the statement continued. “The church has supported the removal of previous legal and material inequities between heterosexual and same-sex partnerships. To change the nature of marriage for everyone will deliver no obvious additional legal gains to those already now conferred by civil partnerships.”

The bishop of Sheffield, the Rev. Steven Croft, said the government plans represented a “really, really fundamental change to an institution which has been at the core of our society for hundreds of years and which for the church is not a matter of social convention but of Christian doctrine and teaching.”

Roman Catholic bishops in England and Wales said in a statement, “In the interest of upholding the uniqueness of marriage as a civil institution for the common good of society, we strongly urge the government not to proceed with legislative proposals which will ‘enable all couples, regardless of their gender, to have a civil marriage ceremony.’ “

The positions taken by the churches drew a scathing response from gay rights activists, like Ben Summerskill, the head of an advocacy group called Stonewall, who accused the Church of England of orchestrating a “master class in melodramatic scaremongering.”

He accused church leaders of promoting a belief that “this is somehow the biggest upheaval since the sacking of the monasteries” in the Middle Ages.

With church attendance falling in Britain, only one in four marriages is conducted in a church.

The question of same-sex marriage is only one of the many gender- and sexuality-related issues confronting the Church of England, which has admitted female priests but is still embroiled in a bitter dispute over their ordination as bishops.