Tuesday 31 July 2012

The Kachin Independence Army . ( Myanmar or Burma )

                        We   have  to   know  the   following  :
  

Historical Background

The Kachins are one of the signatories to the Panglong Agreement in Feb 1947 which gave hope to a fully autonomous Kachin State.
The Kachins are mostly Christian. When Buddhism was declared as state religion in February 1961 under U NU’s regime, the Kachins were upset and formed the Kachin Independence Army (KIA) to fight for an independent Kachin State. The political wing of the KIA is called the Kachin Independence Organisation (KIO).
Source-Free Burma Rangers’ Report
Source-Free Burma Rangers’ Report
The Kachin Independence Army is the second largest armed ethnic group in Myanmar. The KIA claims to have 10,000 troops with another 10,000 reservists. The troops are divided into five brigades with HQ at Laiza.
The Kachins gave up their demand for independence and sought for state autonomy with self determination. Even this demand did not materialise and the KIO entered into a ceasefire with the military regime then called SLORC in February 1994 seeking nothing more than development of this region.
From 1994 Kachin has seen much development though at the cost of a heavy social and environmental price and with much discontentment to the civilian public. A number of hydropower dams including the recently suspended Myitsone dam are in Kachin State.
With the hope of a political settlement the KIO also attended the National Convention, which took more than 14 years to draft the 2008 Constitution. The KIO’s proposal to the National Convention for setting up a Union of Myanmar on the basis of the Panglong agreement was turned down under the threat of breaking the ceasefire agreement.
The Kachin people were (and are still) disappointed with the KIO/KIA for their failure to achieve a political settlement. Besides there were internal dissensions between the KIO and KIA during the period 1994 to 2004 which have weakened both these organisations to the advantage of the military junta.
In September 2010 the KIO refused to become a Border Guard Force under the Myanmar Army and instead made a counter proposal to transform as Kachin Regional Guard Force which was, as expected, rejected by the government.

The Myanmar Army

An extensive report on the army activities in the Kachin State has been compiled by The Free Burma Rangers, a Group that conducts humanitarian work within ethnic areas in Burma. The details of this report were published in Mizzima News (05 June 2012). The following are some of the major details extracted from this report:
  • The Army is pressing attacks with over 100 battalions (approx 8000 troops)
  • The Army is using 60mm, 81 mm and 120 mm mortars as well as 105mm Howitzers.
  • The Army is adopting a three pronged strategy to (1) Control supply lines (2) Cut off access between 5th Brigade (including KIO HQ at Laiza) and 3rd Brigade and (3) cut off access between Laiza area and Laisen Area to the north.
  • The Army is facing difficulty in resupplying their camps and pushing troops and materials forward because of frequent ambushes by the KIA on the army columns and resupply routes. As a result the army offensives have been much slowed down.
  • The Army has taken control of most dam sites, areas where the Chinese dual gas and oil pipelines are being currently laid as well as areas where mining operations are taking place.
  • Consequent to the army action over the last year (since June 2011) over 50,000 Kachin people have been displaced, over 60 Kachin civilians killed and around 100 Kachin soldiers killed. The casualties suffered by the army are not known though some reports indicate that the army also has suffered heavy casualties.

The KIO and the Peace Talks

With a view to end the hostilities between the KIA and the Myanmar Army, the KIO had met with government delegations in June and August 2011. Full scale delegation level talks were held in the Chinese border town of Ruili on 29 November 2011. The KIO’s demand for political dialogue and withdrawal of the army from locations close to the areas under control of the KIA as a precondition to further talks were turned down by the government delegation.
The KIO had the next round of talks with the government delegation at Ruili in China on 18 January 2012. China has been quietly hosting these talks presumably because of its major economic interests in the Kachin State and the influx of refugees into China.
One more round of talks was held on 19 June 2012 at Maija Yang (located on the China-Myanmar border) between the government team and the KIA where little progress was made.
The next round of talks to be held at Bhamo on 09 July 2012 did not materialise as the KIO refused to take part because of an army offensive launched during the weekend near Laiza, the KIO HQ. The Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the Army, Gen. Soe Win was also scheduled to attend the talks.
The KIO continues to insist for a political dialogue before agreeing to ceasefire even though most of the other ethnic armed groups have signed a ceasefire agreement within the last one year. The KIO, by insisting on a political dialogue prior to ceasefire agreement, faces the threat of isolation from other ethnic groups and may also be viewed as a stumbling block to the ongoing reforms by the international community and lose their sympathy and support

                              

Monday 30 July 2012

The K.I.A. ( The Kachins Independent Army )

                                The   article   of   Duwa   Kachin    in   myanmar   language  .  
  
ကခ်င္ေတြ ဘာလုိ႔ လက္နက္ကုိင္ေတာ္လွန္လဲ
Duwa Kachin

အခုတေလာ KIA ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရး Issue က ေတာ္ေတာ္ Hot ေနတာ သတိထားမိတယ္။ ဒီေန႔ ဇြန္လ ၉ ရက္ ဆုိရင္ ဗမာစစ္တပ္ ထုိးစစ္ဆင္တာကုိ KIA ခုခံေနတာ တႏွစ္တင္းတင္းျပည့္တဲ့ေန႔ ျဖစ္တယ္။

အခ်ဳိ႕က KIA ကုိ “လႊတ္ေတာ္ႏိုင္ငံေရးကို လက္ခံလုိက္ပါ၊ ၿပီးေတာ့ လႊတ္ေတာ္ထဲ ၀င္ပါလား” လုိ႔ ေျပာၾကပါတယ္။ ဒီေတာ့ ျဖစ္ပ်က္ခဲ့တာေလး နည္းနည္း ျပန္ေႏႊးလုိက္တာေပါ့။

KIO ဟာ ဖဲြ႔စည္းပုံအေျခခံဥပေဒ ေပၚေပါက္ေရးအတြက္ ေတာက္ေလွ်ာက္ ညီလာခံတက္ခဲ့တယ္။ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံသားအားလုံးအတြက္ အက်ဳံး၀င္မယ့္ ဒီမုိကေရစီလမ္းစဥ္ အခ်က္ ၁၉ ခ်က္ ကုိလည္း တင္ျပခဲ့တယ္ (KIO 19 Points Proposal: http://www.ibiblio.org/obl/docs4/KIO_proposal.pdf) ။ သုိ႔ေသာ္ မွတ္တမ္းတင္ထားေပးမယ္ ဆုိတာနဲ႔ပဲ ဖယ္ထားခံခဲ့ရတဲ့အျပင္ ေျမာက္ပုိင္းတုိင္းစစ္ဌာနခ်ဳပ္တုိင္းမွဴးက “ေတာင္ေပၚကုိ ျပန္ကန္ထုတ္ခံရမယ္” လုိ႔ေတာင္ ၿခိမ္းေျခာက္လုိက္တယ္ ဆုိပဲ (Burma at Crossroads: http://www.encburma.net/index.php/polocy-papers/37-policypapers/108-lian-h-sakhong-burma-at-crossroads.pdf) ။ KIO ေခါင္းေဆာင္ေတြဟာ ဗမာစစ္ေခါင္းေဆာင္ေတြနဲ႔ ေတြ႔တုိင္း ၾကံဳရင္ ၾကံဳသလုိ တမ်ဳိး၊ တရား၀င္နည္းလမ္းက တဖုံ၊ ျမန္မာ့ႏုိင္ငံေရးမွာ ကခ်င္လူမ်ဳိးမ်ားရဲ႕ အခန္းက႑အေၾကာင္း ေျပာတုိင္း က်ေနာ္တုိ႔က စစ္သား၊ ေနာင္တက္လာမယ့္ အရပ္သားအစုိးရနဲ႔ ႏုိင္ငံေရးစကား ေျပာၾကပါ လုိ႔ပဲ စကားလႊဲတတ္က်တယ္တဲ့ေလ။ ဒီေတာ့ ေယာက္်ားစကားပဲ၊ တက္လာမယ့္ အစုိးရလႊတ္ေတာ္မွာ ပါ၀င္ႏိုင္ေရး ႀကိဳးစားတဲ့အေနနဲ႔ KSPP (Kachin State Progressive Party: http://www.mizzima.com/political-pro/new-parties/kspp.html) မွာ KIO ေခါင္းေဆာင္တခ်ဳိ႕ မိခင္အဖဲြ႔အစည္းက တရား၀င္ ႏုတ္ထြက္ၿပီး ပါတီ၀င္တယ္။ အဲဒီပါတီက မွတ္ပုံတင္က်မလာ (http://burmapartnership.org/2010elections/2010/09/ec-rejects-individual-kachin-candidates/) ။ ဘာပဲျဖစ္ျဖစ္ အစုိးရဖဲြ႔ရင္ေတာ့ တခုခုေတာ့ ထူးျခားမွာပဲဆုိၿပီး တက္လာတဲ့ အစုိးရနဲ႔ ႏုိင္ငံေရးစကားေျပာဖုိ႔ KIO ေစာင့္ေနရင္းနဲ႔ပဲ အခုလုိ ထုိးစစ္ဆင္တာ ခံလုိက္ရတာပါပဲ။

“ေသနတ္နဲ႔ ၿခိမ္းေျခာက္တဲ့ ၿငိမ္၀ပ္ပိျပားေရးဟာ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးမဟုတ္ဘူး။ ၿခိမ္းေျခာက္တာ ေၾကာက္မယ္ဆုိရင္ ကခ်င္လူမ်ဳိးေတြ အစကတည္းက လက္နက္ကုိင္ေတာ္လွန္ေရး မစခဲ့ဘူး။ ၿခိမ္းေျခာက္တာ ခံျပင္းလြန္းလုိ႔ကုိ လက္နက္ကုိင္လာတာပဲ။ လက္နက္ကုိင္လုိ႔ ကခ်င္ရြာ မီး႐ိႈ႕တယ္ မေျပာနဲ႔၊ ကခ်င္ေတြ ဘာမွ လက္နက္မကုိင္ခင္ ကတည္းက မုဒိမ္းက်င့္၊ ေစာ္ကားေမာ္ကား ဆက္ဆံ၊ ဘာသာေရး၊ လူမ်ဳိးေရးအရ ခဲြျခားဆက္ဆံတယ္။ ခရစ္ယာန္ဘုရားရွိခုိးေက်ာင္း ေဆာက္ဖုိ႔ ဘယ္ေတာ့မွ ေဆာက္မိန္႔က်တယ္ မရွိဘူး။ တခ်ဳိ႕ေနရာဆုိ ဘုရားေက်ာင္းလုိ႔ နာမည္မတပ္ရလုိ႔ေတာင္ လာၿခိမ္းေျခာက္ေသး။ ဗုဒၶဘာသာ ေစတီမ်ားက်ေတာ့ ႏုိင္ငံေတာ္အႀကီးအကဲ ဆုိသူမ်ားကုိယ္တုိင္ ႏုိင္ငံေတာ္အခမ္းအနားပုံစံ ျပဳလုပ္ေပးတယ္။”

ထုိးစစ္ဆင္တာကုိ တာလီျမစ္ေရအားလွ်ပ္စစ္ေၾကာင့္ရယ္လုိ႔ အမ်ားက ထင္ၾကတယ္။ စစ္အစုိးရက အရင္ကတည္းက KIA ကုိ အျမစ္ျပတ္ေခ်မုန္းဖုိ႔ပဲ။ ဒီေတာ့ KIA ကုိ နယ္ျခားေစာင့္တပ္ (Boarder Guard Force) ေျပာင္းဖုိ႔ အတင္းအဓမၼ ကခ်င္လူမ်ဳိးေတြရဲ႕ ဆႏၵမပါဘဲ တြန္းပုိ႔တယ္ (The Kachins' Dilemma: http://euro-burma.eu/doc/EBO_Analysis_Paper_No_2_2010_-_The_Kachin%27s_Dilemma.pdf) ။ ၂၀၀၉ ခုနွစ္ကေန ၂၀၁၁ ထိ ခဏဏ ၾကားခဲ့ရတဲ့ ဗမာစစ္တပ္ရဲ႕ ရာဇသံ (BGF Deadline) ကုိ ႏုိင္ငံေရးေလ့လာတဲ့ လူအားလုံး ၾကားမိပါလိမ့္မယ္။ ဟုိးအရင့္အရင္ ကတည္းကလည္း ၾကားလည္းမၾကားဘူး၊ ႀကိဳလည္းေျပာမထားတဲ့ BGF အစီအစဥ္က (ဘဘႀကီးရဲ႕ ေစတနာ ဆုိၿပီး လာေပးတဲ့ BGF အစီအစဥ္) KIO ေခါင္းေဆာင္မ်ားလည္း ဘာလုပ္ရမွန္းမသိ၊ စစ္လည္း ျပန္မတုိက္ခ်င္။ သူတုိ႔ စိတ္ကူးထားတာေတာ့ လႊတ္ေတာ္နုိင္ငံေရးနဲ႔ တျဖည္းျဖည္းခ်င္း အေျခခံဥပေဒျပင္ၿပီး စိတ္ခ်ရတဲ့အခ်ိန္ လက္နက္အားလုံး အပ္လုိက္မယ္။ အခုေတာ့ ဘာမွန္းမသိ ညာမွန္းမသိ BGF လုပ္ပါဆုိေတာ့ ကခ်င္ႏုိင္ငံေရး အတုိင္ပင္ခံအစည္းအေ၀း ခ်က္ခ်င္း က်င္းပရတယ္။ BGF လက္ခံမလားဆိုေတာ့ ကခ်င္ျပည္သူေတြ၊ အထူးသျဖင့္ လူငယ္ေတြက ခါးခါးသီးသီး ျငင္းၾကပါေလေရာ (Kachins vow to resist Junta pressure: http://kachinpost.com/news2009/Sept06.html), (http://asiancorrespondent.com/60135/burma-kachin-people-reject-ceasefire-without-political-talks/) ။ မင္းတုိ႔ ေခါင္းေဆာင္ပုိင္း ၿမိဳ႕ေပၚမွာ တုိက္တာအေဆာက္အအုံနဲ႔ ခ်မ္းခ်မ္းသာသာ ဇိမ္ရွိရွိ ေနေနတာကုိ ႏွေျမာရင္ ႏုတ္ထြက္ၾက၊ လူငယ္ေတြ ဆက္လုပ္မယ္လုိ႔ ၀ုိင္းေျပာေတာ့ KIA ေခါင္းေဆာင္မ်ားက မျဖစ္သင့္တာ မျဖစ္ရေလေအာင္ အတတ္ႏုိင္ဆုံး ပဋိပကၡမျဖစ္ေအာင္ သူတုိ႔ပဲ ဆက္ထိန္းမယ္ေပါ့။ အတတ္ႏိုင္ဆုံး စစ္ပဲြေရွာင္ခ်င္တဲ့သေဘာ ...။

သုိ႔ေသာ္ ၂၀၁၁ ဇြန္လ ၉ ရက္ေန႔မွာေတာ့ ဗ်ဴဟာမွဴးကုိယ္တုိင္ KIA ထိန္းခ်ဳပ္နယ္ေျမထဲ ေရအားလွ်ပ္စစ္လုပ္ငန္းခြင္ ခဏ၀င္ၾကည့္မယ္ အေၾကာင္းျပၿပီး ခြင့္ေတာင္း၀င္တယ္။ ၿပီးေတာ့ ျပန္မထြက္ေတာ့ဘူး။ အဲဒီအကြက္ကုိ KIA ဗုိလ္ခ်ဳပ္ဂမ္ေရွာင္က ကေလးအကြက္လုိ႔ နာမည္တပ္ေပးလုိက္တယ္တဲ့။ အဲ့ထဲကေနကုိ ကြပ္ကဲၿပီးေတာ့ KIA ကုိ စတုိက္ေတာ့တာပဲ။ ေနာက္ေတာ့ သူလည္း တင္ပါးနဲ႔ ေျခဖေနာင့္ တသားတည္း ေျပးပါေလေရာ။ ၿပီးေတာ့ KIA ဆက္ဆံေရး႐ံုး၀န္ထမ္းကုိ ဖမ္း၊ စစ္သံု႔ပန္းလဲလွယ္မယ္ဆုိေတာ့ ရစရာမရွိေအာင္ ႏွိပ္စက္ၿပီး အေသေကာင္ျပန္ေပး ... သူတုိ႔ရဲ႕ သံု႔ပန္းက်ေတာ့ မွဲ႔တစက္မစြန္း ျပန္ေပးတယ္ (သတင္းဖတ္ရန္ http://www.mizzima.com/special/kachin-battle-report/5406-burmese-government-not-following-international-policy-on-captives.html) ။ ၿပီးေတာ့ အနီးအနားရွိတဲ့ ရြာေတြကုိ ဒုကၡ စ ေပးေတာ့တာပဲ။ အခုလုိင္ဇာမွာ ခုိလုံေနတဲ့ ဒုကၡသည္ အမ်ားပုိင္း အစုိးရထိန္းခ်ဳပ္နယ္ဘက္က ေျပးလာတဲ့ လူေတြခ်ည္းပဲ။ (Crimes in Northern Burma: http://partnersworld.org/usa/images/stories/crimes_in_northern_burma/crimes_in_northern_burma.pdf) (Burma: Committing Abuses in Kachin State: http://www.law.yale.edu/Burma.Army_Committing_Abuses_in_Kachin_State.pdf) (Burma: Untold Miseries: http://www.hrw.org/features/burma-untold-miseries).

ဒီေတာ့ ဘယ္မလဲ လႊတ္ေတာ္ထဲ KIO ၀င္မဲ့လမ္း။ KIO မေျပာနဲ႔ KSPP ဆုိတာ ကခ်င္လူမ်ိဳးမ်ားပါတီပဲ၊ KIO ထြက္ တေယာက္ ႏွစ္ေယာက္ ပါတာကလြဲလုိ႔ အားလုံး ၿမိဳ႕ေပၚက ရပ္မိရပ္ဖ ကခ်င္၊ ရွမ္း ႏုိင္ငံေရးသမားေတြနဲ႔ ဖဲြ႔ထားတဲ့ ဒီမုိကေရစီစစ္စစ္ပါတီကုိ ဘာလုိ႔ ပါတီမွတ္ပုံတင္ မေပးလဲ။

တခ်ဳိ႕က KIA ဘာ ေတာင္းဆုိေနမွန္း မသိဘူးလုိ႔လည္း ဆုိေလရဲ႕။ KIA ေတာင္းဆုိေနတာ မသိေသးဘူးဆုိရင္ ေျပာျပမယ္။ KIA ဆုိတာ KIO ရဲ႕ စစ္တပ္ပဲ ရွိေသးတယ္။ KIO မွာ ကခ်င္ႏုိင္ငံေရးအဖဲြ႔ေတြ ရွိတယ္။ ႏိုင္ငံေရးအၾကံေပးအဖဲြ႔၊ က်န္းမာေရး၊ ပညာေရး၊ ျပည္သူ႔ရဲ၊ စည္ပင္သာယာေရး၊ လူ၀င္မႈႀကီးၾကပ္ေရး၊ အမ်ဳိးသမီးေရးရာ၊ လူငယ္၊ အားလုံးစုံတယ္ ... ကခ်င္အစုိးရပဲ။ ဒီေတာ့ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္ဟာ ဒီေလာက္ ခုိင္ခုိင္မာမာရွိေနတဲ့ ကခ်င္ႏုိင္ငံေရးအဖဲြ႔က အုပ္ခ်ဳပ္ခြင့္ေတာင္းေနတာ တရားသလား၊ မတရားဘူးလား ဆုိတာ တခုတည္း ေျပာၾကည့္ပါ။ ဒါေတာင္ သီးသန္႔ႏိုင္ငံ ခဲြထြက္ဖုိ႔ မဟုတ္ဘူး။ ကုိယ္ပုိင္ျပ႒ာန္းခြင့္ပဲ ေတာင္းတာ။ ျမန္မာ့အလင္း (ကခ်င္အတြက္အေမွာင္) ပဲ ဖတ္ရင္ေတာ့ KIA ဘာေတာင္းဆုိခဲ့တယ္ ဆုိတာ ဘယ္သိမလဲ။

လြန္ခဲ့တဲ့ ၁၇ ႏွစ္တုန္းက အပစ္အခတ္ ရပ္ လက္မွတ္ထုိးထားတာ KIA က တခါမွ ခ်ိဳးေဖာက္ခဲ့တာ မရွိဘူး။ ရွမ္းျပည္ေျမာက္ပုိင္းမွာ KIA စစ္သားေတြကုိ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးကာလမွာ လက္နက္မဲ့ အသားလြတ္ ဥပေဒမဲ့ ပစ္သတ္လုိက္တာ ႏွစ္ခါေတာင္ သည္းခံခဲ့ေသးတယ္။ အခုလည္း စၿပီး ထုိးစစ္ဆင္တာ KIA မဟုတ္ ဗမာစစ္တပ္က ျဖစ္တယ္။ အခုထိ စစ္ေၾကာင္းမထုိးရင္ သုိ႔မဟုတ္ ထုိးစစ္မဆင္ရင္ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေနၿပီးသား၊ အပစ္ရပ္ေနၿပီးသားပဲ။ KIA က က်ဴးေက်ာ္စစ္ တခါမွလည္း မဆင္ႏႊဲေသးဘူး။ ဒီေတာ့ ဘာအတြက္ အပစ္ရပ္ လက္မွတ္ထပ္ထုိးစရာရွိလဲ။ လက္မွတ္ထုိးထားလည္း စစ္တပ္က ေနာက္ေၾကာကုိ ဓားနဲ႔ ၀င္ထုိးေနတာ ဒီတုိင္း ခံလုိက္ရမွာလား။ အခုလည္း မေသမခ်ာ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးကုိယ္စားလွယ္ ဆုိတဲ့လူေတြက တဘက္မွာ တမ်ဳိးေျပာ၊ အစုိးရသတင္းစာမွာ တမ်ဳိးေရး၊ စစ္တပ္က တမ်ဳိးလုပ္၊ ဘာကုိ ယုံရမွန္းမသိ (ဗုိလ္ခ်ဳပ္ ဂမ္ေရွာင္ ေျပာစကား : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuVi1gLnUJ8&feature=related) စဥ္းစားေပါ့။ ဒီေတာ့ တုိင္းရင္းသားလက္နက္ကိုင္ ဆုိတုိင္း လူဆုိးစာရင္းထဲ အတင္းအဓမၼ တြန္းထည့္ေန႐ံုေလာက္ပဲ ႀကိဳးစားေနသမွ် ဘာၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးမွ ျဖစ္လာမွာ မဟုတ္ပါ။

KIA ဆုိတာ မသိနားမလည္တဲ့ လူမုိက္အုပ္စုက ဦးေဆာင္ေနတာ မဟုတ္ဘူး။ KIO ကုိ စတည္ေထာင္ခဲ့တဲ့ ပုဂၢိဳလ္ေတြဟာ ရန္ကုန္တကၠသိုလ္ေက်ာင္းသားေတြ ျဖစ္တယ္။

KIA ေခါင္းေဆာင္ေဟာင္း ဆရာႀကီး ဦးဘရန္ဆုိင္းဆုိတာ ျမစ္ႀကီးနားက ႏွစ္ျခင္းခရစ္ယာန္ အထက္တန္းက်ာင္း (ေနာက္ပုိင္း ဆရာ အတတ္သင္ေက်ာင္း ျဖစ္သြားတဲ့ ေက်ာင္း) ေက်ာင္းအုပ္ပဲ။ ျမစ္ႀကီးနားက အထက ေက်ာင္းေတြမွာ ဆရာ၊ ဆရာမ ႀကီးေတြလုပ္ေနတဲ့ ပုဂၢိဳလ္ေတာ္ေတာ္မ်ားမ်ား သူ႔တပည့္ေဟာင္းေတြ ျဖစ္တယ္။ အခုလက္ရွိ KIO ဥကၠဌ ဦးေဇာင္းဟခ္ရာလည္း ပါတီစုံေခတ္ ဆြမ္ပရာဘြမ္ ခ႐ိုင္ေတာင္ခ်ဳပ္ေဟာင္းျဖစ္တယ္။ ဗုိလ္ခ်ဳပ္ဂမ္ေရွာင္၊ ဗုိလ္ခ်ဳပ္ဂြမ္ေမာ္ တုိ႔ဆုိတာ တကၠသိုလ္ဘဲြ႔ရၿပီး KIA ထဲ ကုိယ့္ သေဘာနဲ႔ကုိယ္ ၀င္ခဲ့တာျဖစ္တယ္။ အခုလက္ရွိ KIA ဗုိလ္ေလာင္းေက်ာင္းဆင္းအားလုံး ဘဲြ႔ရမ်ားျဖစ္တယ္။ တခ်ဳိ႕ဆုိ နုိင္ငံျခားပညာေတာ္သင္ ဘဲြ႔ရထားတာ English လုိ ေကာင္းေကာင္း ဖတ္တတ္တယ္၊ ေျပာတတ္တယ္။

ဒီေတာ့ KIA ဘာလုိခ်င္လဲ။ ထာ၀ရၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရး လုိခ်င္တယ္။ အပစ္အခတ္ရပ္႐ံုနဲ႔ မၿပီးဘူး။ ထာ၀ရၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရး ဆုိတာ တရားမွ်တမႈမွာ အေျခခံတယ္။ တရားမွ်တမႈဆုိတာ ကုိယ္ပုိင္ျပ႒ာန္းခြင့္မွာ အေျခခံတယ္။ ဒါဟာ ဖယ္ဒရယ္ (Federal) ျဖစ္တယ္။ ဖယ္ဒရယ္ကုိ မသိက်ဳိးကၽြံျပဳထားတဲ့ ကာလပတ္လုံး ျမန္မာျပည္ ဘယ္ေတာ့မွ မၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းဘူး။ ဖယ္ဒရယ္ဟာ ခဲြထြက္ေရးမဟုတ္ဘူး။ ဗဟုိခ်ဳပ္ကုိင္မႈစနစ္ ေလွ်ာ့ခ်ေရး (Decentralization) သာျဖစ္တယ္။ လြတ္လပ္စြာ အတူရွင္တဲြေနထုိင္ေရးမူ ျဖစ္တယ္။ သူ႔ၿမိဳ႕၊ သူ႔ရြာ၊ ကုိယ့္ၿမိဳ႕ကုိယ့္ရြာ အုပ္ခ်ဳပ္ေရး အာဏာပုိင္ ကုိယ္တုိင္ဖဲြ႔စည္းေရးသာျဖစ္တယ္။ အေမရိကန္လည္း ဖယ္ဒရယ္ျဖစ္တယ္။ ဥေရာပႏိုင္ငံအားလုံး ထုိင္းနုိင္ငံအဆုံး ဖယ္ဒရယ္ျဖစ္တယ္။ မေကာင္းတာ ဘာမွမရွိဘူး။

No need to think the Sanction .

                         The article  in   myanmar   language  from   Burma   (Myanmar  )  .  
                

Tuesday, July 31, 2012

ႏုိင္ငံတကာရင္းႏွီးျမႇဳပ္ႏွံမႈအတြက္ ေကာင္းမြန္ေသာအစုိးရအဆင့္ သတ္မွတ္ခ်က္


ႏုိင္ငံတကာရင္းႏွီးျမႇဳပ္ႏွံမႈအတြက္ ေကာင္းမြန္ေသာအစုိးရအဆင့္ သတ္မွတ္ခ်က္
Duwa Kachin

ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံမွာ ဆင္းရဲႏြမ္းပါးမႈ ျမင့္မားေနျခင္းသည္ အေနာက္နုိင္ငံမ်ား၏ စီးပြားေရး ပိတ္ဆုိ႔ထားျခင္း (Sanction) ေၾကာင့္ျဖစ္တယ္လုိ႔ စစ္ေခါင္းေဆာင္မ်ားက ေ၀ဖန္တတ္ေလ့ ရွိပါတယ္။

ဆုိင္သလား၊ မဆုိင္ဘူးလား ဆုိတာ ၾကည့္ၾကရေအာင္ပါ။ စင္ကာပူ အေျခစုိက္ VRIENS & PARTNERS အဖဲြ႔ဟာ ႏုိင္ငံတကာ စီးပြားေရးရင္းႏွီးျမႇဳပ္ႏွံမႈမွာ စီမံခန္႔ခဲြမႈ စိတ္ခ်ရတဲ့ အစုိးရေကာင္း (good governance) အဆင့္ သတ္မွတ္ ေပးေလ့ရွိပါတယ္။ ၂၀၁၁ ခုႏွစ္အတြက္ အာရွ-ပစိဖိတ္ေဒသ ႏုိင္ငံ ၁၉ ႏုိင္ငံ ကုိ မ႑ိဳင္ ၆ ခု (Six Pillars) နဲ႔ တုိင္းတာၿပီး အဆင့္သတ္မွတ္ရာမွာေတာ့ ျမန္မာနုိင္ငံက အားလုံးရဲ႕ ေအာက္ဆုံးအဆင့္ ၁၉ ဆဲြပါတယ္။ Laos ႏုိင္ငံေတာင္ ျမန္မာနုိင္ငံအဆင့္ရဲ႕ အေပၚမွာပါ။ အံ့ၾသဖုိ႔ေကာင္းတာက စီးပြားေရး ပိတ္ဆုိ႔တာနဲ႔ လားလားမွ် မဆုိင္တာ ေတြ႔ရပါတယ္။ Sanction မလုပ္ထားတဲ့ အာရွႏုိင္ငံေတြလည္း ဘာျဖစ္လို႔ မလာသလဲဆုိေတာ့ အခုေအာက္မွာ ေဖာ္ျပပါ အခ်က္အလက္ေတြကုိ ၾကည့္ၿပီး ေၾကာက္လုိ႔ မလာတာ ပုိမ်ားပါသတဲ့။ ရင္းႏွီးျမႇဳပ္ႏွံသူေတြဟာ အစုိးရေကာင္းအဆင့္ သတ္မွတ္ခ်က္မွာ မူတည္ၿပီး စိတ္ခ်ရတဲ့ ႏုိင္ငံေတြမွာ သူတုိ႔ေငြေတြကုိ ျဖဳန္းတတ္ေလ့ရွိပါတယ္။ အစုိးရအေနနဲ႔ ေအာက္ေဖာ္ျပပါ အေရးႀကီး က႑ေတြမွာေတာင္ စည္းကမ္းမရွိရင္ေတာ့ ဘယ္လုပ္ငန္းရွင္မွ ေရရွည္အတြက္ စဥ္းစားမွာ မဟုတ္ပါဘူး။ သယံဇာတ ႏိႈက္ယူမယ့္ လုပ္ငန္းရွင္ အေပါစားေတြေလာက္ပဲ လာမွာပါ။

The Syria Conflict .

                            It is   the  issue   between  the   Veto  members  of   the  U.N.  Security  Council  .    The  U.N.   is  for   prevention  another  world   war  .   not    for   a   tool  of   the  veto  member states  .   God   bless  with  you   ! 
                     
The BBC's Ian Pannell, in the Aleppo area, says residents are facing food shortages and power cuts.
He says the rebels are outgunned by the army, but they are fighting an effective guerrilla war in the streets.
Speaking of the attack on Gen Gaye's convoy, Ban Ki-moon said no-one had been injured, as personnel were protected by the vehicles' armour.
Mr Ban was initially understood to have said that the convoy had been attacked by "army tanks", but according to an official transcript of his remarks, he actually spoke of "armed attacks".
He also said the UN was "still waiting" for the Syrian government to honour its commitment to end armed violence.
Mr Ban expressed particular concern about the impact of shelling and heavy weapons such as helicopters in Aleppo.
He also called on the government to renounce any possibility of using weapons of mass destruction, including chemical weapons and to ensure that stockpiles were kept secure.
Last week Damascus said it would not use chemical weapons inside Syria, but did not rule out their use in the event of an attack by foreign powers.
'Try everything'
The fighting comes as the UN Security Council remains chronically divided over Syria, with Russia blocking attempts by Western nations to ramp up pressure on President Bashar al-Assad.
France is due to take over the presidency of the Security Council this week, and Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius has pledged to continue pushing the issue.
He called Mr Assad an "executioner" and said he would ask for a ministerial level meeting of Security Council members before the end of the week.
"We must try everything," he said on French radio, "even though Russia and China have blocked resolutions on three separate occasions."
Meanwhile Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said there could be room for compromise.
In an interview with The Times newspaper, he said the positions of Russia, the US and UK were not as different as is sometimes suggested.

Sunday 29 July 2012

Wastern and Arab power !

       They   cannot  change   the  fundamental  status   of   middle   east   value  but   only     the  U.N.  security   council  members  states  to  be   changed  . 
Appeal for weapons
 
The Syrian opposition council's head, Abdel Basset Sayda, appealed to foreign backers for heavy weapons to help the opposition counter the government's superior firepower.  
 
Visiting Abu Dhabi, the SNC chief said the rebels need weapons that can stop tanks and planes.  He said that such supplies will "make Syrians able to defend themselves against this killing machine."
 
As the fighting raged, Syria's Foreign Minister Walid al-Mualem made a previously unannounced visit to Syria's staunch ally, Iran.  
 
At a Tehran news conference, he asserted that what he called the "anti-Syrian forces" gathered in Aleppo to fight the government "will definitely be defeated."
 
Iranian warning
 
Iran's Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi warned about the consequences for the region and the world should the Assad government fall. 
 
He said it is "naive" and "an illusion" to think that if there is a power vacuum in Syria and a transition of power, a new government could easily be established.  
 
Pope Benedict appealed for an end to all violence and bloodshed in Syria and called on the international community to spare no effort to help find a just political solution to conflict.
 
Speaking at his summer retreat of Castel Gandolfo, the pope also asked Syria's neighbors to help refugees fleeing the violence and make sure they are given all necessary humanitarian assistance.

Saturday 28 July 2012

Which is true ?

          It   is   clear   that  ,   Taiwan  is  taiwan   and   R.O.C.   is  the   R.O.C.  Taiwan   is   a   part   of   the  R.O.C. which   is   not  Taiwan   .   Chinese  Tipei  flag  is   represented   the   Chinese   from   taipei   .   Would   you   agree  with  my   opinion  ?   
God   bless   with   you   !

Beijing forces Regent Street to switch Taiwan's national flag

  • Staff Reporter
  • 2012-07-28
  • 14:37 (GMT+8)
Top: the ROC flag, third from left, was originally raised over Regent Street before being replaced by Chinese Taipei flag in the bottom shot. (Internet photo)
Top: the ROC flag, third from left, was originally raised over Regent Street before being replaced by Chinese Taipei flag in the bottom shot. (Internet photo)
Before the start of the 2012 Olympic Games on Friday, Taiwan's national flag had been flying among the other flags of the world decorating London's famous shopping district of Regent Street until inevitable pressure from Beijing forced a change to the compromise flag of Chinese Taipei.
The initial move to fly the national flag was greeted with excitement in Taiwan, where people are used to seeing the emblems of the Republic of China — the country's official name — suppressed on the world stage by opposition from Beijing, which rejects any acknowledgement of Taiwan's status as a de facto independent nation.
Yet all too soon the flag was taken down and later replaced by the altogether less inspiring Chinese Taipei Olympic flag on account of political interference from the People's Republic of China, reports our sister newspaper China Times.
To welcome the 206 teams coming to London for the Olympics, the Regent Street Association — not affiliated with the London Organizing Committee or LOCOG — placed the national flags of the participating country on the streets. Taiwan's national flag — red with a navy blue canton bearing a white sun — was hung at the south end of the street close to Piccadilly Circus on July 20.
Pictures of the flag went viral on the internet, causing joy in Taiwan that the country could finally show its national flag at a major international event. The flag was removed by the association however on Tuesday, three days after it went up, and after two days of a noticeable gap between the flags of Syria and Tajikistan, it was replaced by the Chinese Taipei flag on Thursday. The compromise flag has been used at Olympic events since the early 1980s after the International Olympic Committee ruled Taiwan could not compete under its official name of the Republic of China.
"Taiwan's national flag was removed due to political interference," Annie Walker, head of the Regent Street Association, was quoted by Taiwan's Central News Agency as saying. After China stated it was not happy about the display, the British Foreign & Commonwealth Office asked if we could replace the flag after a discussion with the Olympic organization, Walker added.
The removal disappointed many Taiwanese nationals in the UK, while Taiwan's president, Ma Ying-jeou, ordered an investigation into the matter on Friday.
"If the flag was taken down because of pressure from China, Taiwan will raise the issue with China since such actions are not conducive to the normal development of ties across the Taiwan Strait," Fan Chiang Tai-chi, spokesman for the Presidential Office in Taipei, was quoted by CNA as saying on Friday.
The Chinese embassy in the United Kingdom has declined to comment on the matter.

Friday 27 July 2012

Syria and Russia relation effect .

                            The  Relation  between   Syria   and   Russia  would   determind  not  only   the  future   of   middle   east   but   also   the    U.N.  SECURITY  COUNCIL    status  .   How   would   you  think  ?  
                    Double standards?
Russia employs the same argument for the helicopter gunships it is trying to send back to Syria.
These are Soviet-era attack helicopters which the Russians have been refurbishing. Last week, the Russian cargo ship which was transporting them had its insurance withdrawn in British waters and the vessel was forced to turn back, but Moscow says it is determined to complete the delivery.
The West accuses Russia of shoring up President Assad with weapons shipments. Russia accused the West of double standards.
"Why is the US determined to sell weapons to Bahrain after the Bahraini authorities, with help from the Saudis, suppressed the Arab Spring in Bahrain?" asks defence analyst Ruslan Pukhov, head of the arms trade think tank CAST.

Syria's Russian-made military

  • Nearly 5,000 tanks; 2,500 infantry fighting vehicles; 2,500 self-propelled or towed artillery units
The vast majority of Syria's equipment was supplied by the Soviet Union and then Russia. Many of the tanks are the T55 design, which is more than 50 years old
  • 325 Tactical aircraft; 143 helicopters
Russia still services some Syrian aircraft. It is hoping to return a shipment of refurbished Syrian Hind helicopters, of the sort used in Syria's crackdown on rebels, despite Western protests
  • Nearly 2,000 air defence pieces
Syria has bought modern Russian air defence systems in recent years to try to stave off attack from Israel
  • 295,000 active personnel; 314,000 reserve personnel
The Syrian crackdown has largely involved ground forces supported by tanks and armoured vehicles, artillery, mortars, helicopters and drones. But there are doubts about the reliability of many army units. The most difficult operations are being entrusted to elite units with close ties to the regime
Statistics: IISS Analysis: Jonathan Marcus
"Russia doesn't see any problems selling weapons to Syria if the CIA and French and British secret services are shipping military hardware via Turkey to the rebels."

Syria conflict as power planning of in middle east .

                  Syria   Crusis   is   become  a  power  struggle   of   the   U.N.  SECURITY   COUNCIL   .   It   is   too   early  to   predict  the  future   of   Syria  leader  .  
              
Proxy wars
The spillover into Lebanon, for example, is no longer a theoretical possibility.
Syrian refugees at Kilis, Turkey (22 July 2012) Syria's war is already having an impact on its neighbours, with refugee camps along borders
More than 20 people were killed in violent clashes earlier this year between the Alawite minority - the same sect as President Assad in Syria - and the Sunni majority in the northern Lebanese city of Tripoli.
Indeed, no other country in the region is likely to feel the impact of the events in Syria more than Lebanon.
The war in Syria has aggravated an already polarised Lebanon between supporters of the Syrian rebels and friends of the Assad regime.
Among the regime's supporters are the Shia Hezbollah group and its powerful militia, whose emergence and survival has, for many decades, depended on vital ties with Damascus and its allies further afield in Iran.
The demise of the Assad regime in Syria does not bode well for either of them, and no-one can predict, with any degree of certainty, how they will respond.
Optimists believe that Hezbollah will not plunge the country into civil war and will resign to reconfiguring itself as a domestic player defending Shia interests inside Lebanon instead of trying to flex its regional muscles.
Traditional sectarian and ethnic loyalties aside, no other political order in the region has tied its fate and future to a network of non-state actors like the Assad regime. These include the fundamentalist Shia Hezbollah group in Lebanon, Palestinian militants in Gaza and the West Bank, Turkish Kurdish separatists and Sunni jihadists in Iraq.
For decades, it has relied on such allies to wage proxy wars in the geopolitical struggle for survival and supremacy.
Iraq is another case in point. Some analysts have noted a possible link between events in Syria and the sudden spike in violence in Iraq.
Although it is possible that Sunni militants in Iraq may have simply felt encouraged to challenge the Shia-dominated government in Baghdad, it is not beyond the realms of possibility that Damascus is, once again, pulling some strings