DPP tenders no-confidence motion
There is no constitutional crisis or issue and Government policy issue which is yet unknown , but it has only the problem of Ker Chien-Ming who has been charged with asking Wang to peddle influence to get a breach of trust conviction .
DPP wants to make a searching fire for Ker's Defence , for 2014 Nation-wide Local Elections and the presidential election in 2016 to find out the guide-line , slogan and platform to attach the Taiwan Independence theory .
According to the International Law , taiwan is neither a sovereign state nor independent courtry .
The Legislative Yuan of Taiwan is one of the most ugly parliament in the world which is without responsible person for the poor performance or dishonest mannered legislators .
Kinds of No Confidence motion +++++++++++++++++++++++
A motion of no confidence is primarily a statement or vote which states that a person in a superior position - be it government, managerial, etc. - is no longer deemed fit to hold that position. This may be based on said person falling short in some respect, failing to carry out obligations, or making choices that other members feel are detrimental.
In law, a motion of no confidence (alternatively vote of no confidence, censure motion, no-confidence motion, or (unsuccessful) confidence motion) is a parliamentary motion which when passed would demonstrate to the head of state that the elected parliament no longer has confidence in (one or more members of) the appointed government.
A censure motion is different from a no-confidence motion. "No Confidence" leads to compulsory resignation of the council of ministers whereas "Censure" is meant to show disapproval and does not result in the resignation of ministers. The censure motion can be against an individual minister or a group of ministers, but the no-confidence motion is directed against the entire council of ministers. Censure motions need to state the reasons for the motion while no-confidence motions do not require reasons to be specified.
Sometimes, the government will choose to declare that one of its bills is a "motion of confidence". This may be used to prevent dissident members of parliament from voting against it.
In the Westminster system, the defeat of a supply bill (one that concerns the spending of money) automatically requires the resignation of the government or dissolution of Parliament, much like a non-confidence vote[citation needed], since a government that cannot spend money is hamstrung. This is called loss of supply.
When the upper house of a Westminster system country has the right to refuse supply, such as in Australia during the events of 1975, the convention is in a grey area as Westminster governments are not normally expected to maintain the confidence of the upper house.
No Responsibility , No Authority ! Why , What are you doing ?
God bless with you ! ...................................
There is no constitutional crisis or issue and Government policy issue which is yet unknown , but it has only the problem of Ker Chien-Ming who has been charged with asking Wang to peddle influence to get a breach of trust conviction .
DPP wants to make a searching fire for Ker's Defence , for 2014 Nation-wide Local Elections and the presidential election in 2016 to find out the guide-line , slogan and platform to attach the Taiwan Independence theory .
According to the International Law , taiwan is neither a sovereign state nor independent courtry .
The Legislative Yuan of Taiwan is one of the most ugly parliament in the world which is without responsible person for the poor performance or dishonest mannered legislators .
Kinds of No Confidence motion +++++++++++++++++++++++
A motion of no confidence is primarily a statement or vote which states that a person in a superior position - be it government, managerial, etc. - is no longer deemed fit to hold that position. This may be based on said person falling short in some respect, failing to carry out obligations, or making choices that other members feel are detrimental.
In law, a motion of no confidence (alternatively vote of no confidence, censure motion, no-confidence motion, or (unsuccessful) confidence motion) is a parliamentary motion which when passed would demonstrate to the head of state that the elected parliament no longer has confidence in (one or more members of) the appointed government.
A censure motion is different from a no-confidence motion. "No Confidence" leads to compulsory resignation of the council of ministers whereas "Censure" is meant to show disapproval and does not result in the resignation of ministers. The censure motion can be against an individual minister or a group of ministers, but the no-confidence motion is directed against the entire council of ministers. Censure motions need to state the reasons for the motion while no-confidence motions do not require reasons to be specified.
Sometimes, the government will choose to declare that one of its bills is a "motion of confidence". This may be used to prevent dissident members of parliament from voting against it.
In the Westminster system, the defeat of a supply bill (one that concerns the spending of money) automatically requires the resignation of the government or dissolution of Parliament, much like a non-confidence vote[citation needed], since a government that cannot spend money is hamstrung. This is called loss of supply.
When the upper house of a Westminster system country has the right to refuse supply, such as in Australia during the events of 1975, the convention is in a grey area as Westminster governments are not normally expected to maintain the confidence of the upper house.
No Responsibility , No Authority ! Why , What are you doing ?
God bless with you ! ...................................
No comments:
Post a Comment