Saturday 8 November 2014

Myanmar's Powerful Military should be trained for Moral Courage and Moral Obligation .

    The  Proportional  Representation  electoral  system  is  not  suitable  for  Burma   or   Myanmar   .
    It  produces  ' Weak ' coalition   government  rather   than  strong   majority  government   ,which  arguably   can   lead  to   indecision   ,  compromise   and   even  Parliament  Paralysis  .
               PR  list   system   can be   without   the   link  between  the   elected  representative   and   his  or   her   constituency   .
              The  greater   Complexity   and   Choice   that   ,  PR   allows   can  put  voters   off   voting  ,  by  requiring   Public  to   have  a  greater   knowledge   of   individual   and   party  positions  .
               The  public  can   be   cheated  by   the   political    parties  and   constituency  .
               According   to   Military  approved   2008  constitution   which   allowed   the  25%  of   Parliament   member  seats  of   Army   Officers  without   public votes  ,  in   the  Parliament   of   the  Republic   of   Union  of   Myanmar  .
               The  Proportional  Representation  Electoral  System  was  created  by   the   Military  ( Tatmadaw  )   group  which   can   block   or   veto  the   2008   Myanmar   Constitutional  Change  .
                The    FPTP  SYSTEM  should   be   continued   using   to   elect  the   Parliamentary   Members  in   2015   election  .  Thank  !  all  the   people   in  Myanmar  .

The   greatest  "   HOPE  "  OF   the   people   Myanmar  , The  moral  courage  and   the  moral  obligation  of  the  Tatmadaw  .
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Myanmar’s powerful military is against any proposed changes to the constitution that will take away its veto power over all future amendments to the charter, according to a parliamentary panel tasked with reviewing the country’s military-written constitution.

The 31-member committee, which formed in February to report on constitutional amendments to parliament, submitted its final report to the legislature on Tuesday, containing proposals from all political parties, civilian organizations, and the military.

Parliament will discuss the points raised by the report, including Article 436 of the constitution, which allows effective veto power by Myanmar’s military over proposed constitutional changes.

Article 436 effectively gives the military, which controls 25 percent of seats in parliament, a veto over constitutional amendments, since it requires more than 75 percent of parliamentary representatives to approve any change.

Opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi has said that getting rid of the military’s veto is the first step needed to pave the way for other charter amendments.

San Pyi, the committee’s joint secretary, told RFA’s Myanmar Service that the military has defended the contentious provision.

“The military representatives of parliament proposed that this should be maintained in its original form,” he said.

Conditional approval

San Pyi also said that Myanmar’s ruling Union Solidarity Development Party (USDP) gave conditional approval to amending Article 436.

The USDP said that as the party moves to implement democratic reforms, any “improvements” to the constitution “must be made in consideration of the important roles played by the people and the people’s representatives and in accordance with the timelines of the situation,” according to San Pyi.

Aung San Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy (NLD) has called for an amendment to Article 436, proposing that all future constitutional amendments be approved by two-thirds of elected lawmakers or more than half of all lawmakers, said Aung Kyi Nyunt, an NLD lawmaker.

Following that, the NLD wants a referendum to be held in stages where more than half of those eligible to vote would have to approve the amendments.

The NLD, with the 88 Generation students group, had collected nearly 5 million signatures during a campaign from May 27 to July 19, calling for an end to the military’s veto power on amendments to the constitution, just before the committee submitted its preliminary report.



No comments:

Post a Comment