Thursday 25 July 2013

Top U.S. General Out lines Military Options , Why ?

                   The   Military  Options  would   be   thought   by   the   U.S. 
Why  ? :  The   opposition  groups   have  no   Unity  Force  ,   from   the  outside  Publice  Area  or   Fredom   Movement  Area   or    Liberated  Zone .  
                 Almost   all   their  movements  are  among  the   Public   Building  ,Home  buildings   which   are   used  as   for  covers  or  shields  in   the   fighting   groung  and  ( they)   cannot  face  and  hit   back to  the   government  force  . 
              They   have  lost  Syrian  peoples '  support  in   the   battle   ground  , every   where  was  become  Humannitarian   Disaster  . 
               Thay have  no  common  political  mean   to   face  the   reality  conflict   and   they   have   without  National  Guide  Line  for   Syrian   People  .
            Uncal  Sam  !   Please ,  remind  yourself  -  What   to   do  for  the  Syrian   War  in  Violence  ,  to  find   the   solution  without   foreign  Intervention which  has   been  depending   on   Uncal   Sam   and  Russian  as   the   world 's  desire .  God   Bless  with   you  ! 
 We   don't  like  the  Regional  War   in  Middle-East  ............

Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Gen Martin Dempsey offered five military options, including limited strikes and establishing a no-fly zone.
But he said using force in Syria would be "no less than an act of war" and could cost the US billions of dollars.
Washington has so far ruled out military intervention in Syria.
Its role in the conflict is currently limited to delivering humanitarian aid to Syrian refugees in neighbouring countries and providing non-lethal help to the Syrian opposition.
In an open letter to senators, Gen Dempsey analysed five military options the US military could potentially undertake in Syria:
  • training, advising and assisting the opposition
  • conducting limited strikes
  • establishing a no-fly zone
  • creating buffer zones inside Syria
  • controlling Damascus' chemical arms
Gen Dempsey estimated that the first option would cost about $500m (£325m) a year, while each of the other four actions would require roughly $1bn a month.
"The decision to use force is not one that any of us takes lightly. It is no less than an act of war," he wrote in the letter.
Gen Dempsey acknowledged that the outlined actions would strengthen the opposition and put more pressure on President Bashar al-Assad, but he warned the US should learn from its previous interventions, as in Afghanistan and Iraq.
"We have learned from the past 10 years, however, that it is not enough to simply alter the balance of military power without careful consideration of what is necessary in order to preserve a functioning state," he said.
Gen Dempsey's letter was in response to questions by two members of the Senate Armed Services Committee which is considering re-appointing him for a second two-year term as chairman of the joint chiefs.
More than 90,000 people have been killed in Syria since the uprising again President Assad began in 2011, according to the UN.
A further 1.7 million have been forced to seek shelter in neighbouring countries

No comments:

Post a Comment